Holy Cows Ser. 6


The Commodore's Law

 An analysis of "The Ethics Codes - Offenses and Penalties".


 

 

 

 

 


If you wondered if  there were areas of irrationality in Scientology™ - look no further. Among the Holy Cows we have been chasing, this one is the holiest! It has earned 5 haloes! This was a surprise to us.  But as we kept going on with our tedious analysis, the picture became clearer and clearer. Read for yourself. No 'selling', no 'black PR' needed ; just step by step analysis of 
"The Ethics Codes - Offenses and Penalties". 
It reads like running out an Engram.


Justice and Group Engrams

I remember each time I tried to read the whole "Offenses and Penalties" 'the mind's protection' would set in and I would kind of black out and not be able to read the page in front of me to the end. It has always puzzled me what kept on happening to me as 'Misunderstood words' were not the problem.

Doing this article I finally managed to read the whole thing closely. But it struck me along the way, that if  this kind of black out happens for you too, and maybe many other Scientologists and Freezoners we actually have some kind of Group engram here. 

We have been subject to these rules and laws, but they were clouded by 'Pain and Unconsciousness'. They were too painful even to read.  This may be the mechanism behind how some oppressive regimes get away with harsh or worse justice. People simply refuse to realize it exists. They go blank or black out when they run into it. They may explain incidents of it away as unfortunate or unusual cases. 

The 'Court records' in Scientology™ (Findings of Committee's of Evidence etc.) are not publicly available either. This is another way this justice stays out of sight and becomes part of the 'Group Bank' rather than the Analytical Mind of the group. 

It would be quite a treasure for analysis if these Scientology™ records were as available and you could sit down and read through them one by one, as you can do with court records in the government court systems.

 

The Commodore's Law

The way the "Offenses and Penalties" is written I will call it 'The Commodore's Law". It bears similarities with the Justice that ruled in the days of Admiral Nelson - the famous British Navy hero. 

Since Hubbard was a US Navy veteran (and Commodore of the Sea Org),  we assume the model is based on US Navy's Military Law.  Mutiny, insubordination, desertion, misconduct, and other offenses harmful to military discipline are violations unique to military law.  These are all found in 'Offenses and Penalties'. The 'Courts' in Scientology™ as 'Board of Investigation' (B of I) , 'Ethics Hearing', 'Court of Ethics' and 'Committee of Evidence' (ComEv) bear resemblance with how the navy and military administers justice. The best known military court being  Court Martial. 

The Ethics Codes of Scientology™  have not gone through a legislative body (such as a parliament, if it was a country), nor through the hands of legal experts (which corporations routinely do with their laws, bylaws and policies). So we have a Code, that is written by the Commodore and is not subject to question or change. As Policy can only be changed or cancelled by the Commodore himself - and he isn't available - they are now permanent!

The Missing Review Process

As a fiction writer Hubbard would have an agent and an editor to smooth things out. They would come with suggestions and advice - and sometimes directions and orders. They would be diplomatic or negotiate on his behalf and help him to 'flourish and prosper'. They would step in and stand up for him if critics attacked him; something most creative people abhor. LRH was no different. He was a passionate defender of his teachings - a common trait for trail blazing writers and scientists. 

When it came to writing the "Offenses and Penalties", Hubbard had no friends like an agent or editor. We know of no legal experts, that gave him  advice. Most of the clauses were first published in policies or technical bulletins on a specific subject, with a foot note that such and such a deed be included in the Ethics Codes as a Misdemeanor up to a High Crime (Suppressive Act). These were never questioned or put through any kind of review process. They were just added, because 'the Commodore says so'.

 

This May Be a First!

What we attempt here may be a 'First'. At least I have never seen it done before - with Scientology™ 'Ethics Codes' that is. As an academic exercise it's common practice. We are putting  the Ethics Codes through a review process. 

The US Congress did something more radical to the US Military Code, when they in 1951 established the 'Uniform Code of Military Justice'. On the background of atrocities done in the name of 'Military Justice' during World War II, they completely revised the military justice system and placed the operations in the hands of professional lawyers to ensure fairer application.

The way we have done our review, is, that we first decided upon a 'Constitution of Scientology'. That was our first step. Both countries and large corporations have such a thing. These are the senior documents/laws,  that set the guidelines for all consecutive laws, rules or policies. It's 'unconstitutional' and illegal to pass laws in conflict with these documents. Only  'Emergency powers' (as a government or constitutional term) or Martial law can override such laws in a regulated way - and only on a temporary basis.

 Under certain circumstances basic individual rights can be set aside if the situation warrants immediate action without time for explanations. That is by the way exactly what group engrams are all about. Urgent orders without time to explain. 
(World War II veterans were subject to countless group engrams due to harsh military justice).

 

'A Scientology™ Constitution'

We looked at the vast literature of Scientology™  to isolate constitutional points. Since Scientology™ is basically a humanitarian effort, they were not hard to find. If we should pick just one Document, it would be The Creed of the Church of Scientology. A Creed in any Church is a founding document and an Absolute. We looked a little further, however and have only picked a few points here and there.

The most relevant are The Goals of Scientology, The Creed of the Church of Scientology™ and The Code of a Scientologist. I am here just quoting a few lines relevant to justice and constitutions.

From the Creed, that in part follows 'Human rights' we needed the following:

That all men have inalienable rights to their own religious practices and their performance.
(Label: Free religion)

That all men have inalienable rights to conceive, choose, assist and support their own organizations, churches and governments. 
(Label: Organize)


That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely, to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon the opinions of others. 
(Label: Free speech)


That all men have inalienable rights to their own defense.
(Label: Own defense)

(The 'Label' is the short hand we use in table below). 

From Code of a Scientologist we are using these:

1. To keep Scientologists, the Public and the Press accurately informed concerning Scientology, the world of Mental Health and society.
4. To decry and do all I can to abolish any and all abuses against life and Mankind.
Label: Abuse
8. To support true Humanitarian endeavors in the field of Human Rights.
9. To embrace the policy of equal justice for all.
Label: Eql. Just
10. To work for freedom of speech in the world. Label: Free speech.
11. To actively decry the suppression of knowledge, wisdom, philosophy or data which would help Mankind. Label: Free thought
12. To support the freedom of religion. Label: Free Religion

These are all good human rights principles. You find many of them in constitutions. Some of them are unique to Scientology. 
We are not trying to write the constitution for Scientology™ here. But we needed something to evaluate each point against. We held each point of the Justice Code up against the above points - our 'constitutional' points - and asked, is this point in conflicts with these basic rights and rules? Is it 'Constitutional in Scientology?'

 

Table and Tabulation

Below is a long table, where we evaluate each of the 160 offenses listed in the 1978 edition of the "Offenses and Penalties". Later editions of this Code exist. The difference is, that more offenses have been added and post titles may have changed (e.g. WW is now International Justice Chief). Since no offenses have been deleted, the 1978 edition works for our purposes, namely to survey the character of the system. In addition, in 1978 Hubbard was still running things, so we know the Code was his work without alterations.  

We then evaluated each point and added it all up in the table below. 

You may want to read the tabulation first.  That is a summary and bottom line of doing the 160 plus rows table, line by line. 

Don't miss out on the whole thing. Do yourself a favor and go back and read through the whole table; it is quite fascinating and enlightening to understand the details. 

To me it was like running out an engram (to old timers it may be a whole engram chain). You don't just skip the whole thing saying "Yeah, I pretty much know what happened".  To me it was a revelation to look at the ins and outs. Maybe no wonder, since this was, I believe, the first time I managed to actually go through the whole thing without going 'unconscious' or black out or run.   

The detailed analysis of the Code is what sets this essay apart from all the 'black PR and 'selling' accounts countless individuals have attempted. The Scientology™ Justice system has been 'trashed' many times. This article is intended to run out the 'actual incident' or chain of incidents.  

 

 Click here if you want to go to the summary  Tabulation. now.

Read related short encyclopedia articles, 
used in the research for this article.

 


     Check our Content Page

Read related short encyclopedia articles, used in the research for this article.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 it struck me along the way, that if  this kind of black out happens for you too, we actually have some kind of Group engram here. 

 

 

 

The 'Court records' in Scientology™  are not publicly available either. This is another way this justice stays out of sight and becomes part of the 'Group Bank'

 

 

 

 

 

 we assume the model is based on US Navy's Military Law. 

 

 

The Ethics Codes of Scientology™  have not gone through a legislative body, nor through the hands of legal experts

As Policy can only be changed or cancelled by the Commodore himself - and he isn't available - they are now permanent!

 

 

LRH was a passionate defender of his teachings - a common trait for trail blazing writers and scientists. 

When it came to writing the "Offenses and Penalties", Hubbard had no friends like an agent or editor. We know of no legal experts, that gave him  advice.


(click to enlarge)

Handwritten unofficial  'Justice Pl' 
by Hubbard: 
"If anyone does anything to get any of these organizations in bad publicity, such as narcotics charges, drunk driving or other unsavory data, I have a policy - I will beat their teeth in personally.

Sincerely - LRH"

On the background of atrocities done in the name of 'Military Justice' during World War II, the US Congress completely revised the US military justice system


 We first decided upon a 'Constitution of Scientology'.

...the senior documents/laws,  that sets the guide lines for all consecutive laws

 

 

 Since Scientology™ is basically a humanitarian effort, constitutional points were not hard to find. 

 If we should pick just one Document, it would be The Creed of the Church of Scientology.

The Goals of Scientology

 

 

The Creed of the Church of Scientology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Code of a Scientologist

 

 

 

 

 

 

We are not trying to write the constitution for Scientology™ here. But we needed something to evaluate each point against.  

 

We held each point of the Justice Code up against our Scn. 'constitutional' points and asked
-  Is this 'Constitutional in Scientology?' 

 

 

 

 

 

You may want to read the tabulation first.  That is a summary and bottom line of doing the 160 plus rows table, line by line.

 

it was like running out an engram (to old timers it may be a whole engram chain). You don't just skip the whole thing saying "Yeah, I pretty much know what happened".

 

This article is intended to run out the 'actual incident' or chain of incidents.  

 

 

 

 



THE ETHICS CODES

OFFENSES AND PENALTIES

(Tabulation of  all Misdemeanors, Crimes and High Crimes, From Intro to Scn Ethics, 1978 Edition.)
(Only Column 'Offense/Crime' from book).

Consecutive numbering
for easy
reference

Offense/Crime Does it violate Scn
Creeds
, Codes or Basics?

Scn 'Constitution'
Comments

Compared to 
what body of
 rules/laws?

Grading
'Flunks' are marked. Rest are 'Pass'.

 
Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
 

MISDEMEANORS

TECHNICAL MISDEMEANORS

Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
1 Knowing and repeated departures from standard technology, instructional procedures or policy. OK pass professional
conduct
Fair
2 Processing a known Potential Trouble Source or the family or adherents of a Suppressive Person or Group. OK Based on PTS tech. Since definition (determination) of SP is shaky and  can see used as a derogatory label, arbitraries are easily let in. 
(precedent/ definitions needed).
professional
conduct
Generality
Problematic
(flunk)
3 Auditor's Code breaks resulting in a disturbance of the preclear. OK Good. Vital to subject professional
conduct
Fair
4 Failure to follow the Supervisor's Code resulting in disturbed students. OK Good professional
conduct
Fair
5 Issuing data or information to wrong grades or unauthorized persons or groups or issuing data or information broadly without authority. OK OK professional
conduct
Fair
6 Any staff auditor turning in an illegible report. OK Good professional
conduct
Fair
7 Any staff auditor attesting falsely to TA or falsely reporting the flattening of a process. OK Good. Vital professional
conduct
Fair
8 Any staff auditor running any process on any organization preclear that is not given in grade and level HCO Bulletins. OK Good. Keep the tech straight. professional
conduct
Fair
9 Any alteration or non-standard rendition of a process. OK As long as it's not used to stop research: fine. professional
conduct
Fair
10 Any staff auditor running a preclear above the preclear's grade instead of for the next grade, or running processes out of sequence in a grade. OK Good. Qualified researchers excepted. professional
conduct
Fair
11 Any student knowingly altering technology, applying processes improperly, or using technology illegally on paying preclears, or lower students or the public, while a student. OK Good.  professional
conduct
Fair
12 Any other answer to a student's demand for verbal technical or unusual solutions than the permitted: „The material is in (HCO Bulletin, Policy Letter or tape)." „What does your material state?" „What word did you miss in the (Bulletin, Policy Letter or tape)?" and requests for unusual auditing solutions: „What did you actually do?" OK This way of supervising is very robotic and harmful to understanding. Makes course rooms into boot camps. Not a place of learning  and gaining understanding (=ARC).
Other  ways to protect the tech from  alter-is needed.
Military law Games Condition
(flunk)

GENERAL MISDEMEANORS

Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
13 Non-compliance. OK Inspires militarism Military law.
Employment
Harsh
14 Discourtesy. OK Inspires militarism Military law.
Employment
Harsh
15 Insubordination. OK Same. The 3 Impede ARC, self determinism, but can be needed at times Military law.
Employment
Harsh
16 Mistakes resulting in financial or traffic loss. OK Valid in any job/employment contract Employment Fair
17 Commissions or omissions resulting in loss of status or the punishment of a senior. OK Very vague and subjective.
Since precedent is not used in Scn Justice,  proper definitions are needed. (precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law Generality
(flunk)
18 Neglect or gross errors resulting in the need to apply the Emergency Formula to their person, section, unit, department, organization, zone, or Division. OK Same as above. But here you can at least look at statistics employment Fair
Generality
19 Continued association with squirrels. violates creed A violation of Creed of CoS. This  makes it Military law's: 'Fraternizing with the enemy'.  Military law
Harsh
20 Abuse or loss or damage of organization material. OK Valid in any job/employment contract Employment Fair
21 Waste of organization material. OK Valid in any job Employment Fair
22 Waste of funds. OK Valid in any job Employment Fair
23 Alteration of senior policy or continued ignorance of. OK Valid in any job Employment Fair
24 Consistent and repeated failures to wear their hat regarding Dev-T. OK Can you feel LRH's despair? Rule fair, but too open to interpretation Employment Fair
Generality
25 Refusing an E-Meter Check. Violates  Creed Is open to misuse and oppressive use of sec checks 'Constitution' violated = Martial  law Military law
Martial
Games Condition
(flunk)
26 Refusing auditing when ordered by a higher authority. Violates  Creed
aud Code
Is open to misuse and oppressive use of sec checks. Creed violated=Martial  law
Violates Aud. Code
Military law
Martial
Games Condition
(flunk)
Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
27 Disturbing a course or class. OK Needs hardly saying nor a law Employment Fair
Generality
28 Disrupting a meeting. OK Needs hardly saying nor a law Employment Fair
Generality
29 The discovery of their having an undisclosed criminal background in this lifetime. OK Background check. Widely accepted. Employment Fair
30 The discovery of an undisclosed tenure in a mental hospital. OK Borderline, but since this is a central  point in PTS tech we can live with it Employment
PTS Policy
Harsh
31 Omissions resulting in disrepute or financial loss. OK Needs to be defined. 'Generalities won't do'. Employment Fair
Generality
32 Assisting the inadequacy or decline of income or traffic in a section, unit, department, organization, zone, or Division. OK If things are not going well  nobody is safe under this one. Needs defining.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law
Employment
Generality
(flunk)
33 Failure to acknowledge, relay or comply with a direct and legal order from an executive staff member. OK Basically fine. Should be defined better. Military law Fair
Generality
34 Misconduct. OK Whoops. Opens the door  to a world of Ethics abuse.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law generality
(flunk)
35 „Unauthorized issue"; issuing material that does not have an authority for that purpose. Violates Code There is such a thing as I.A. even on public statements. Just doesn't work in that formulation.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law
Employment
Generality
What material?
(flunk)
36 Contributing to a crime. OK Basically fine. Should be defined better. criminal law Fair
Generality
37 Any staff member in a senior organization having vital data concerning an organization, department, unit or section that is IN AN EMERGENCY STATUS, or information clearly indicating that it should be, not bringing the matter effectively to the attention of superiors in his own organization. OK Sounds fair if you have the right team spirit. 'Not bringing the matter effectively to the attention of superiors' makes it shaky. Military law
Employment
Fair
Harsh

ETHICS MISDEMEANORS

Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
38 Failure to appear before a Committee of Evidence as a Witness or Interested Party when personally given summons or receiving summons by registered post. OK Fine. True in any court system Civil law Fair
39 Refusing to testify before a Committee of Evidence. OK Fine. True in any court system Civil law Fair
40 Showing contempt or disrespect to a Committee of Evidence when before it. OK Fine. True in any court system Civil law Fair
41 Destroying documents required by a Committee of Evidence or refusing to produce them. OK Fine. True in any court system Criminal law Fair
42 Withholding evidence. OK Who? the suspect? Civil law Generality
(flunk)
43 False swearing on a signed statement or form. OK Fine. True in any court system Criminal law Fair
44 Impeding Ethics. OK? This is declaring open season on anybody not watching out.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law Generality
(flunk)
45 Refusing to serve on a Committee of Evidence. OK There can be reasons Civil law Unfair
(flunk)
46 Refusing to vote while a member of a Committee of Evidence. OK Fair Civil law Fair

CRIMES

 

NON-COMPLIANCE AND NEGLECT

Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
47 Non-compliance with urgent and vital orders resulting in public disrepute. OK Open to interpretation and misuse. Used a lot to bust people Military law Fair
Harsh
48 Placing Scientology™ or Scientologists at risk. OK Very common generality in Findings from ComEv's. 
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law Generality
49 Omissions or non-compliance requiring heavy intervention by seniors, consuming time and money, with Dev-T. OK Too open to interpretation - as many other  points are. Makes you think, there is something unsaid or missing definitions. Employment Harsh
Generality
50 Failure or refusal to acknowledge, relay or execute a direct legal order from an International Board Member, or an assistant Board Member. OK Fair, but with an air of Military  organization. Employment
Military law
Fair
51 Following illegal orders or illegal local policies or alter-is, knowing them to be different or contrary to those issued by the Int. Board. Following illegal orders or illegal local policies or alter-is, knowing them to be different or contrary to those issued by the International Board. OK Fair, but with an air of military organization. Military law Fair
52 Not directly reporting flagrant departures from International Board policy in a section, unit, department, organization, zone, or Division. OK Fair, but with an air of military organization. Military law Fair
Harsh
53 Being long absent from post while a senior executive without advising the Board Member of his or her Division. OK Too little data to make good sense.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Employment Generality
(flunk)
54 Permitting a section, unit, department, organization, zone or Division to collapse OK Very common generality in Findings from ComEv's. 
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law Generality
(flunk)
55 Not taking over as a deputy in a crisis not otherwise being handled. OK You  should. Making it a crime not to, is military style. Military law Fair
Harsh
Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
56 Not reporting the discovery of a Crime or High Crime to World Wide while in authority or as a member of a Committee of Evidence or as a witness before a Committee of Evidence. OK Fair, but with an air of military organization, when made a crime. Military law Fair
Generality
57 Refusal to accept penalties assigned in a recourse action. OK OK civil law Fair
58 Overworking an executive by ignoring one's duties. OK Common generality in Findings of ComEv's. 
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law Generality
(flunk)
59 Protecting a staff member guilty of a Crime or High Crime listed in this code. OK Commonly known as  'aiding and abetting'. OK civil law Fair
60 Committing offenses or omissions that bring one's senior staff member, unit, department, organization or zone official to personal risk and/or a Committee of Evidence, civil, criminal or court. OK If there is a rule here, we demand to know. Otherwise it's too easy to misuse.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law
Employment
Generality
(flunk)
61 Condoning circumstances or offenses capable of bringing a course, section, unit, department, organization, zone or Division to a state of collapse. OK If there is a rule here, we demand to know. Otherwise it's too easy to misuse. Often seen used in ComEv's.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law
Employment
Generality
(flunk)
62 Neglect or omission in safeguarding the copyrights, registered marks, trade marks, registered names of Scientology. OK CoS are very protective of copyrights and TM's. Would be fine if they didn't resent selling the materials freely. Copyright law Fair
63 Neglect of responsibilities resulting in catastrophe even when another manages to avert the final consequences. OK If there is a rule here, we demand to know. Otherwise it's too easy to misuse. A favorite in Findings. Military law
Employment
Generality

FINANCIAL CRIMES

Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
64 Passing Organization students or preclears to outside auditors for private commission. OK Would be part of any reasonable employment agreement. Employment Fair
65 Taking an organization position to build up a private practice. OK? Speaks to intent, which is not evidence nor punishable. Employment Unfair
(flunk)
66 Taking private fees while on staff to audit outside preclears, run private courses, coach or audit students or organization preclears. OK This is an old problem in many professions. Can easily be twisted into a games condition Employment Fair
67 Embezzlement. OK Agree Criminal law Fair
68

Taking commission from merchants

OK Agree Criminal law
Employment
Fair
69

Reselling organization material for private gain.

OK Agree Criminal law Fair
70 Using an organization position to procure personal or non-Scientology™ funds or unusual favors from the public, a firm, student or preclear. OK Too general to make it a clear crime. Can think of many examples where it isn't.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Employment Generality
(flunk)
71 Making out or submitting or accepting false purchase orders. OK Agree Criminal law Fair
72  Juggling accounts. OK Agree Criminal law Fair
73 Illegally taking or possessing organization property. OK Agree Criminal law Fair
74 Obtaining loans or money under false pretenses.  OK Orgs, registrars and their FSM's do that all the time. Should be enforced. Criminal law Fair - often violated
75 Pretending Scientology™ certificates, classifications or awards not actually held to obtain money or credit. OK Agree Employment
professional
conduct
Fair
76 Selling auditing hours or training courses for advance which are not then delivered as to hours and time in training (but not results or subject matter). (Flag and Orgs) OK Orgs, registrars and their FSM's do that all the time. Should be enforced. Civil law Fair
 - often violated
77 Theft. OK Agree Criminal law Fair

TECHNICAL CRIMES

Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
78 Being or becoming a Potential Trouble Source without reporting it or taking action. OK As it's formulated you can charge, pc's students and staff with this. Made a crime it's  Military law style.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military
Employment
Unfair to pc's
(flunk)
79 Receiving routine auditing other than that intended for the handling of a Potential Trouble Source, while being PTS. OK As it's formulated you can charge pc's with this. Made a crime it's  military style.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law
PTS tech
Unfair to pc's
(flunk)
80 Withholding from local Scientology™ executives that he or she is a Potential Trouble Source. OK As it's formulated you can charge, pc's students and staff with this. Made a crime it's  military style.
(precedent/ definitions needed).
Military law
PTS tech
Fair
Harsh
81

Failing to report a Potential Trouble Source to local HCO.

OK Open the door to a police state. Generality.  Military law
PTS tech
Generality
Harsh
(flunk)
82 Using Scientology™ harmfully. OK This is too open to interpretation. Other points should cover. Professional
conduct
Generality
83

Not bringing a preclear up through the grades but overwhelming the preclear with high grades.

OK Agree Professional
conduct
Fair
84 Processing or giving aid or comfort to a Suppressive Person or Group. OK The lack of compassion is legendary in CoS. Showing it can even be a crime. Military law
Professional
conduct
Games Condition
(flunk)
85 Issuing the data or information or instructional or administrative procedures without credit or falsely assigning credit for them to another.  OK This seems to be an LRH special. Would hardly pass any legislative process as a crime. copyright law
PR
Fair
- If they will
make it avail.
86

Allying Scientology™ to a disrelated practice. 

 

OK This is another LRH special. Would hardly pass any legislative process as a crime. It seems to seed many controversies. Professional
conduct?
Games condition
(flunk)
87 Harmful flagrant and continued Code Breaks resulting in important upsets. OK Agree Professional
conduct
Fair
88 Issuing any Scientology™ data under another name. Conflict with Creed This is another LRH special.  It seems to seed many controversies.  'Fair use' quotes and rewrites are perfectly legal and common. Professional
conduct
Employment
Copyright
Games condition
internally Fair
89 A student damaging another by willful application of incorrect technology may be charged by his Supervisors with a Crime and a Court of Ethics action must be requested by his Supervisors. OK OK Professional
conduct
Fair
Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
90 Any Supervisor teaching or advising any method not contained in HCO Bulletins or on tapes, or slighting existing HCO Bulletins, Policy Letters or tapes. Against Creed Freedom of Speech. The evaluating of importances is an essential part of learning. You can misuse this to make it illegal. To make it a Crime is wrong. Professional
conduct
Unfair
(flunk)
91 Any staff auditor reporting falsely verbally or in writing on an auditor's report. OK Agree Professional
conduct
Fair
92 A student falsely enrolling. OK Agree Civil law Fair
93 Putting HCO at risk of reputation by false attestation as a student or preclear. OK It should be tech's responsibility to catch this. To declare pc a 'criminal' is silly. Yet 'False Attestation' needs to be covered. Military law? Harsh
94 Running a course without a checksheet. OK Agree Professional
conduct
Fair
95 Changing a checksheet on a student after it's issued to him. OK Agree Professional
conduct
Fair
96 A Power Auditor seeking or accepting advice verbally or in writing on how to run Power Processes from a person not doing the folder. OK Agree Professional
conduct
Fair
97 Any auditor accepting an unusual solution without filing a job endangerment chit or found using an unusual solution must be charged with a Crime and given an Ethics Hearing. Failing to report an unusual solution advised or used is also so handled. An „unusual solution" is one evolved to remedy an abuse of existing technology. OK Agree basically. Can be misused to make the system very rigid, prevent research etc. But OK in a delivery Org. Professional
conduct
Authoritarian
Fair
98 A Potential Trouble Source knowingly permitting the Suppressive Person to be processed without advising the auditor or Scientology™ authorities. OK There is a lot of opinion in PTS SP tech. Until that is resolved this clause shouldn't be law. Kids have their parents labeled 'SP's' for their own case reasons, for instance. Professional
conduct
Authoritarian
Generality

GENERAL CRIMES

99 Organizing or allowing a gathering or meeting of staff members or field auditors or the public to protest the orders of a senior.  Against:  free speech, organize. Only what we call Martial law can justify to set aside Creed; and only temporarily. Yet many such 'crimes' and 'high crimes' are listed here. Need to be resolved by other means.  Military law
Martial Law
Games condition
(flunk)
100 Using a local Scientology™ title to set aside the orders or policies from the International Board. OK OK. But system needs a little more flexibility for local managers. Simplified Operating Policies would do it. Military law Fair
101 Impersonating a Scientologist or staff member when not authorized. OK Agree employment Fair
102 Inciting to insubordination. OK 'Insubordination' is a Military  term. Another flavor of military rule. Military law Fair
Harsh
Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
103 Instigating a local power push against a senior. OK This could be used with good cause, but also misused. Military law Generality
104 Spreading destructive rumors about senior Scientologists. Creed: Free Speech. Nobody likes it; but there are better ways to deal with this than making it a crime Martial law
civil law
Games condition
105 Pretending to express a multiple opinion (use of „everybody") in vital reports, which could influence assistant board or board decisions. (Board should know better - freedom of speech) Creed: Free Speech. Nobody likes it; but there are better ways to deal with this than making it a crime.  Board should know better than believe such reports too. employment Harsh
106 Refusal to uphold discipline. OK 'Uphold discipline' is a military term. Flavor of military rule. Military law Harsh
Generality
107 Getting another staff member disciplined by giving false reports about him or her. OK Agree Civil law Fair
108 Falsifying a communication from higher authority. OK Seems OK on surface. It has a Military law flavor, however. Military law
Employment
Harsh
109 Falsifying a telex message or cable. OK Agree civil law Fair
110 Causing a staff member to lose prestige or be disciplined by giving false reports. OK Ethics seems to do this as the way to conduct business. It is too tricky to deal with as a crime Military law
Employment
Harsh
Ref.
No  

Offense

Consti
tutional?

Comments    

Compared to Grading
111 Seeking to shift the blame to an innocent staff member for the consequences of one's own offenses. OK It is too tric