Date: 19 Mar 1999 04:00:17
Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
From: pilot@soda.csua.berkeley.edu (The Pilot)
Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 52 - MID MAR 99 PILOT POSTS TO ARS/ACT


POST52.txt 

SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 52 - MID MAR 99 PILOT POSTS TO ARS/ACT

The first few, down to the Humor post, were to ARS & ACT,
the remainder were to ACT only.


==========================================

Contents:

 subj: Super Scio - COFS WITH ITS EYES WIDE SHUT
 subj: Super Scio - AN LRH ED FROM 1969
 subj: Super Scio - To ThomLove on FZ Bible and MSH
 subj: Super Scio Tech - To Aaron on the Expanded CofS Cleanup Process
 subj: Super Scio Humor - COLUMBUS IN THE SEA ORG
 subj: Super Scio Tech - To Bill On Self Clearing
 subj: Super Scio Tech - To Pat on R6
 subj: Super Scio Tech - Continuing the Targ Discussion (attn Zero, Paul, etc.)
 subj: Super Scio Tech - Entity Handling
 subj: Super Scio Tech - A Grand Experiment
 subj: Super Scio Tech - SEQUENCE OF ABBERATION
 subj: Super Scio (reformatted) MASTER LIST OF MATERIALS OF THE R6 ERA


==========================================

 subj: Super Scio - COFS WITH ITS EYES WIDE SHUT


COFS WITH ITS EYES WIDE SHUT


Well it happened again.

The pickets came out with their Xenu signs and the CofS
applied ostrich tech.

But it wasn't the same old ostrich tech.  Oh no, they did 
something far worse.  Something so incredible that I think
that LRH's ashes out there in the pacific have been raising
storm clouds to send against the LA Complex.

For the first time, CofS has cut its own dissemination lines
to its membership.

And it did it out of fear.

The birthday event at the Shrine was not promoted.

Or rather, it was not promoted intensively.  The endless
bulk mailings to everybody who ever sneezed near an org were
completely absent.

They didn't want a lot of people to come.  They promoted on
internal lines only without the usual attemps to reach everybody
under the sun.

This goes beyond ordinary footbulleting.  They have reached
the point of psychosomatic footbullets where they dramatize
the impacts regardless of whether the bullets are fired or not.

Imagine a CofS that is afraid to promote to its own membership.

I can't, its just too incredible.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj: Super Scio - AN LRH ED FROM 1969


AN LRH ED FROM 1969


As I have mentioned elsewhere, in the Fall of 1968 LRH
introduced Standard Tech and the bulk of Scientology
was regulated to the "pretty rocks" that would distract
one from the real road out.

The source of the bank was identified as R6 and all other
case supposedly came from OT 3, therefore the grades only
existed to get somebody keyed out enough to let them do
the upper levels.

The result was what later came to be called quickie tech,
but when it was first issued by LRH, it was called Standard
Tech.

The technical staff was treated abusively with overboarding
etc. and the field auditors were mostly stamped out of
existance as squirrels because they practiced older tech
rather than standard tech.

Note that the tech degrades policy (forbidding saying that
some piece of tech is old etc.) did not come out until 1970.
Until that time, Ron was the most entusiastic tech degrader
that we had, continually labling tech as old and making
fun of anybody who used anything but the latest new process.

As stats collapsed, the why was identified as out-ethics
and mass declares and mutinys became commonplace.  People
were blowing staff in all directions, and most especially,
nearly all the trained auditors left.

The witch hunting for SPs became chronic and Sea Org
missions found every why under the sun except for the
real one which was that there was something wrong with
the tech itself.

Eventually there was a reform and what we now know as
expanded grades were put in and standard tech was redefined
(see the C/S series).  But that didn't happen until the
middle of 1970.

So let's take a time machine back to those days and see
what LRH thought was wrong back at the hight of the
madness.

For this you'll need a few definitions -

LRH ED = LRH Executive Directive.

US = The Scientology network in the United States, including
the Advanced Org in LA (AOLA) and American St. Hill (ASHO)
and the big outer orgs in LA, NY, and Washington (and 
smaller orgs in many other places).

HCO ES = HCO (Hubbard Communications Office) Executive
Secretary - One of the 3 Exec Sec positions (the others
are the OES or Org Exec Sec and PES or Public Exec Sec).
In this time period an org was basically run by the 3
exec secs as overseen by the Assistant Guardian (AG).
In later years there was an ED (Executive Director) above
them, but that was not the case at this time.

EC = Exec Council.  This is a council composed of the 3
exec secs.  It was the governing body for an organization.

ECUS = The exec council US, which was in charge of all of
Scientology in the US.  Each org also had its own lesser
exec council (ECDC, ECNY, etc.).

WW = World Wide.  This is the next level above US etc. and
controlled all of Scientology.

==============

I'm only going to give excerpts from this LRH ED so as
to remain within fair use.  My commentary follows.


LRH ED 8 US 14 WW of 9 Dec 69, "US Graph Decline".

Begining on Page 661 of the blue volumes, LRH EDs Series 3.

.

> In short, THIS is the cause of US stat decline.  It is
> internal.  It traces to HCO ES WW and ECUS.
>
> Austin and ASHO were put in Treason by HCO ES US.
> ASHO has never recovered nor really has Austin.
>
> Data available here is sparse but positive.  US orgs
> were simply beaten down and stripped of personnel.

.

> NY was battered down by internal invalidation of its execs
> and interference by a person pretending to be an SO
> missionaire, Ron Zarro.
>
> During this period HCO ES WW (Nov 68 to Oct 69) was
> Edie Hoyseth.
> 
> ECUS was Julia Salmen - Ken Salmen - Don Breeding, then
> Lee Handeland, Wally Handeland, and Ray Derby.  R. Shafron
> relieved Lee Handeland as HCO ES US and was on post during
> the major upset.
>
> The Deputy Commodore Pacific should convene a Comm Ev on
> the above named persons and any deputies and any ECUS
> personnel ....

.

> However, US orgs should know what began their current decline
> and not incorrectly assign the reason to other things as
> they may be doing.
>
> Full action has been taken to prevent reoccurence of any
> such instances.  Better security measures are now in force.

.

> The US orgs do not realize they are at war and have
> not been alert.
> 
> Man up, get in your security and get the show on the
> road.
>
> Love,
> Ron

================

My oh my.  It looks like some bad hat SPs in executive
positions beat the orgs down and stripped them of personnel.

But it's being fixed.  There was an EC of bad hats (Salmen etc.)
but they've already been declared, and then another SP (Handeland)
got in there and now is out, and now we are doing a comm ev on
the next batch of execs because those are probably SPs too.

It was like that everywhere.  The org I was at (occasionally,
in between blows - few people could bear staying on for long
during the reign of terror) also had its exec council declared
SP about once every three months.  Then the next set of
scapegoats would be happy at their promotions only to find that
it was impossible to get the stats up with all the staff
blowing and the public running away in droves.

But thanks to this wonderful ED, we were saved from the
mistake of assigning an incorrect reason for the collapse.

Never mind that the more standardly the tech was applied
(such as being sure to end the session the second an FN 
appeared before the PC could key himself in again by voicing
a cognition), the faster the PCs caved in.

===================

Of course some of the critics will say that it was all
bullshit anyway.  But it wasn't.  Even in this bad time
there were occasional wonderful gains mixed in with the
robotic and fanatical mistakes that were kicking people
in the teeth.

The true horror of the times was that LRH had been brilliant
but was now service facing and refusing to admit to any
errors while cases were caving in on all sides.  Instead,
it was all the fault of the SPs, the psychs, the world
conspiracy, the Marcabs, or whatever.

Somehow or other, the older tech that LRH had abandoned
was restored in 1970 and a halfway reform did occur.
Without that the subject would not have survived.

Unfortunately, the fanaticism and the policies which
support witch hunting never did disappear and remain
with us to this day.

And the basic research error which led to believing that
doing the CC would free somebody from all abberation
without addressing anything else in the person's case
was never faced up to honestly.  (Hilarious considering
that they don't even bother running the CC anymore).

And I don't mean to invalidate CC here either, there are
gains to be had from running that platen.  But it's
like building a bridge ten feet out into the channel
and then stopping and pretending that its finished
while people drive off into mid air and fall in the
drink.

If you at least taught them how to swim first, they
might have a chance, but of course that would be
squirreling.


Sadly,

The Pilot

==========================================


 subj: Super Scio - To ThomLove on FZ Bible and MSH


TO THOMLOVE ON FZ BIBLE AND MSH

On 17 Mar 99, Thomlove <Thomlovenetmail@netscape.net> posted
on topic "Thank You, Secret Squirrel!"

This was in response to the FZBA posting of the 35 tapes of
the 9th ACC.  (the FZBA posts came through the secret squirrel
remailer).


> Thank you!
> 
> You risk much, and your efforts do not go unheralded! The path you lay
> before us is to be well traveled!
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Of course, I didn't/won't download anything.
> 
> My only wish is that I could send some tithe to MarySue for all you who
> do. I love her dearly. She deserves the platter and everything on it.
> 
> Did any of you lurkers know that MarySue paints, fine art type of
> paintings? She is quite the lady!!
> 
> Thomas.


I agree with your sentiments.  I doubt that she has the rights
to anything anymore or gets anything from the CofS.

Let's pretend that there really are 8 million Scientologists.
And lets imagine that there is a huge website with all 300MB
of Ron's works including all the tape transcripts etc.

If each of the 8 million just sent her 10 dollars as a thank you
for the website, she would have 80 million dollars.

Of course the critics will be quick to point out that the
active membership has dropped down to about a hundred thousand
(which would still be a million dollars, plus more millions
from freezoners), but if the work was so easily available, I
would expect that there would be millions of fans very quickly.

And let me also add my thanks to FZBA for working so hard to
get LRH tech onto the net despite the dangers from the tech
suppressors at OSA.

Personally, I think that these early ACCs are the most advanced 
works of the OT research line.

Like the 8th ACC, the 9th was given at the time of CofHA routes 1
and 2, definitely recommended for anyone running these drills.


And here is a nifty quote from lecture 12A of the 9th ACC:

# Any time any science has said or any practice has suddenly 
# said "Well, now this is absolutely it, and we have reached an
# unobtainably high thing, and we are at this unobtainable
# point," you knew damn well that there were some loose
# wheels left somewhere in it.
 

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj: Super Scio Tech - To Aaron on the Expanded CofS Cleanup Process


TO AARON ON THE EXPANDED COFS CLEANUP PROCESS

On 7 Mar 99, "Aaron Bair" <aaron@xartech.com> responded 
to my post on "Super Scio Tech - CofS CLEANUP PROCESS (expanded)"

> [re: Pilot's post dated 4 March 1999]
> >It runs like dynamite.  There was steam coming out of my[...]
> >Hope this helps,
> >The Pilot
> 
> This helps! Runs more like a nuclear blast on some of us. :)
> 
> The yield can be improved a bit.  Try this:
> 
> A. WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR THE SAKE OF THE GROUP
> B. WHAT HAVE YOU WITHHELD FOR THE SAKE OF THE GROUP
> 
> C. WHO OR WHAT HAVE YOU CONTROLLED FOR THE SAKE OF THE GROUP
> D. WHAT HAVE YOU AVOIDED THINKING FOR THE SAKE OF THE GROUP
> 
> And then work the other sides:
> 
> A. WHAT HAVE YOU AVOIDED DOING FOR THE SAKE OF THE GROUP
> B. WHAT HAVE YOU SAID FOR THE SAKE OF THE GROUP
> 
> C. WHO OR WHAT HAVE YOU AVOIDED CONTROLLING
>    FOR THE SAKE OF THE GROUP
> D. WHAT HAVE YOU THOUGHT FOR THE SAKE OF THE GROUP

This is an excellent expansion, although I would be inclined to
run A/B as one process (alternating) and C/D as a separate process.  

The control button is right on target.

In fact, control seems to follow so naturally that it raises
the idea that we should probably have an entire regimen of
control processes above O/W.

Of course there are the CCHs, except that they don't address
the PC's considerations and actions on the subject of control.

One good process (in general) might be

a. What would you be willing to control
b. What would you be willing to leave uncontrolled.

I thought about the C/D pair above and it didn't feel quite
right as a general purpose process.  Instead how about -

a. What have you controlled
b. What have you avoided 

 
> This is a beautiful thing.
> Aaron Bair
> 7 March 1999
> 
> 
> With a name like "CofS CLEANUP PROCESS", I think the reach of this
> post will exceed the normal audience.  This may well be the first
> process people are willing to try out after leaving the group.
> Good choice!

That would be extremely good.  But I'm afraid that some of them
might have such a heavy ARC break that they would be unwilling to
run anything else until the BPC is handled.

Assuming that enforced agreement is the key button that the
org is dramatizing, and since the usual trick is to use the
comm formula to enforce it, maybe we should add -

A. What were you talked into agreeing with
B. What did you talk another into agreeing with

Here we are sitting on something that is so basic that I think
that we shouldn't limit the question to CofS (it would probably
grind as being too late on the chain) but need to let it run 
earlier as needed.

In case anyone is reading this who would like to try it but
doesn't know how processes are run, let me mention that a
pair of questions like this are repeated alternately until
the area is cleaned up.

 
> Note that this process can get stuck.  Its no big deal.  If the group
> you are working on stops running (or never starts running) switch
> (temporarily) to another group.

Good point.  Or let it shift to an earlier similar group.

 
> You might be surprised at the things that come up in even the most
> trivial groups.  Past or present jobs, families, churches, friends,
> businesses, schools, teams, clubs, squads or any other group that you
> have attention on are all fair game.  If you get bored, find a more
> interesting group.
> 
> Then visit http://freezoneamerica.org and get yourself a copy of the Pilot's "Self
> Clearing" book.  Each chapter address one specific area of life's
> troubles and contains exercises you can do that improve your ability
> to handle that area.  Its free, and there is no church involved. :)
> 
> -Aaron
 
(He repeated my earlier post, but it is in the archive so I'll
omit it here).

This was very helpful.

Thank you,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj: Super Scio Humor - COLUMBUS IN THE SEA ORG


COLUMBUS IN THE SEA ORG


It was the 15th century.

Europe was recovering from a dark age, struggling to reclaim
the knowledge lost in the fall of the Roman Civilization.
And leading the seach for truth was the great El Hubbardo,
known the world over as a scientist, banker, and holy man.

And in his wisdom, the Hubbardo did see that there was a
need to keep knowledge secret and standard and under control
least it be used to mankinds detriment.  And to achieve this
end, he did create a team of holy inquisitors to see to the 
standardness of all ideas and the enforcement of all agreements, 
for what is agreed upon will become real.

But the holy inquisitors did betray the founder, failing to
adequately employ the rack and the hot irons to maintain
the standardness.  And in their negligence, it came to pass 
that the squirrels were able to spread a new agreement that 
changed the shape of the world.

And so there came a terrible night of shaking.  The children
cried in their beds and dread fear gripped the hearts of
many.

And with the dawn, it was discovered that the world had
become round for the squirrels had third partied its
flatness and implanted a new idea.

At first Hubbardo was in dispair at the terrible thing
that had come to pass.  But then he realized that it could
be used to advantage, for an easy route to India would
allow the clearing tech to be sold there with great profit.

With a mighty florish, he picked up his trusty emeter and
assessed for the circumferance of the newly rounded world
and came up with the precise figure of 17,000 miles.
Not 16,999 or 17,001 but 17,000 precisely, because the
tech is always precise.

As to the SPs who claim that Ptolomy had calculated that
same figure thousands of years before, they are obviously
mistaken because the Earth was still flat while Ptolomy
was alive.

Then came the great day when Hubbardo announced the
formation of a "Sea Org" which would sail the great ocean 
and clear the planet.

It was the year of "cannonball fast" technical breakthroughs
and soon there was a grand fleet of 3 ships abuilding in
the shipyards of Spain.

Commanding the expidition was Lt. Commander Christopher
Columbus, and in 1492, he set sail for India bearing
a cargo of E-Meters and "Way to Happiness" booklets.

At first things did not go well.  The Indians knew nothing
of the oriental spices and they did not want to accept
the "Way to Happiness" booklets.  They even went so far
as to pretend that they did not understand Hindustani or 
the various Chineese dialects that the Sea Orgers used in
addressing them.

When the reports came back to him, Hubbardo knew that
there was something terribly wrong, and so he began
a massive research project to discover the source of
the Indian abberation.  And this lead to his making the
great discovery that Nero had fed the Roman populace
into the volcano at Pompeii and their souls were now
infesting the Indians.

With this discovery, it became possible to clear the
Indians.  Within a few decades, the volcano clearing
along with any necessary sec checking and ethics handling
saw to it that the Indians regained their heritage,
learning to speak the proper oriental languages and
growing spices.

And that is why, to this day, we still consider that
America is an excessively large island off the coast
of China, for of course nothing has been allowed to
change since Hubbardo discarded his body to continue
the research.


Humorously,

The Pilot

==========================================


 subj: Super Scio Tech - To Bill On Self Clearing


TO BILL ON SELF CLEARING

On 11 Mar 99, ciric@gte.net (Bill Maier) posted on
subject "Pilot: Results of solo auditing"

> Over the past several months I've been running solo processes
> from Pilot's Self-Clearing book.  Although I have had some
> major wins with it, I recently began to have doubts about the
> effectiveness of the solo auditing I've been doing.  I decided to
> review the processing I've done over the past few months (this
> action was itself beneficial).
> 
> I should perhaps mention that I took the Dianetics course in
> 1973 and did some auditing as a Qual auditor for a while, so
> I'm not a complete beginner at this.  Generally when I run
> solo sessions I use a meter, and I try to use strict solo TRs.
> However, case-wise I am definitely at a low level, having
> had very little auditing.
> 
> After reviewing my sessions, I came to the conclusion that
> the results of my processing could be grouped into 4 general
> categories:
>     1. The process ran well and reached a good EP.
>     2. The process ran quickly to a light EP.
>     3. The process did not seem to run at all and was abandoned.
>     4. The process bogged down.
> 
> As a rough estimate, I would say that perhaps 30% of my
> processing falls into the first category, 40% in the second, 20%
> in the third category, and 10% in the fourth.

Even good professional handling will have some things that
run in category 2.  So a mix of categories 1 and 2 is to
be expected.  And accumulating light wins sets you up for
future actions.  In fact professional handling of a case
on life repair often runs mainly in category 2 until the
case starts flying.

And note that as you build up speed and begin running deeper,
even the "light" wins become huge, because what is light is
relative.

The outpoint is categories 3 and 4.  
 
> My gut feeling is that the second  and third categories are
> mainly due to trying to run a process that is either uncharged
> to begin with or is too far above my reality.  One of the rules
> of auditing that has become very real for me lately is the idea
> of running only items that read on the meter.  When running
> incidents or an assessment this obviously applies, but how
> does one go about determining this for a repetitive process
> (particularly one with several questions in a bracket)?  I don't
> know if there is a way.

Process commands can be checked on the meter.  This varied
over the years, but usually the standard was to check them.
But note that you need to check suppress and inval as well
if the command itself doesn't read.

But interest is often a better indicator, hence the suggestion
that one can skip things that don't seem interesting and
pick them up on a second pass.

 
> The fourth category (hard bog) is the most difficult for me.
> Once things start to go badly I find it very difficult to get back
> on track.  I've tried the Green Form, Pilot's Appendix B, and
> other assessment lists, but they rarely work.  Usually I have to
> just end the session and take up something else in a day or two
> when things calm down.  I know this isn't the best solution.

Running correction lists is unfortunately one of the most
difficult processing skills.  They are also miraculous if
you are up to that skill level.

This is the area where a professional could help a lot.
Simply getting a green form FNed once by a pro could unstick
a lot of bogs and show you, by example, how to unstick future
bogs as well.

But don't let a lack of professional assistance stop you.
As long as you keep moving, you'll make it eventually.

 
> It seems to me that when things start to bog down the bank
> has been become greater than the PC, and so further solo work
> is difficult at best.  One solution I've found is to try to avoid
> the possibility of a bog by running very light processes.  While
> this does work, it doesn't seem to be a very promising
> solution for long-term gain.

It does work, because you build up momentum and gradually
get the case flying.  As you accumulate wins, your concept
of what is "light" will change until everything seems like
a "light" process.

 
> With all this in mind, I decided to continue solo auditing but
> with an additional element of research.  If things go well, fine,
> but if not I'm going to carefully record the results so that
> perhaps I can look back over these failures and determine
> what went wrong.
> 
> Bill

Yes, this is the thing to do.  And your work on this could
help others.

Another thing that would help is to have freezone practicioners
offering booster rundowns (FNing the GF, C/S 53, etc.) to 
help speed up self clearing.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj: Super Scio Tech - To Pat on R6


TO PAT ON R6

On 5 Mar 99, "Patricia Krenik" <pkrenik@hotmail.com> responsed to
my post on "Super Scio Tech - Answering the Pilot's comments to Lakis"


(Pat begins with an excerpt from my earlier post)

> ..
> >
> >There are errors and flagrant violations of basics in new things
> >that were developed in the later days.  The most notorious is
> >the original OT 3 (before cumulative cluster etc.) which forces
> >the PC into a single late track incident and insists that it is
> >The Why.  And the entire concept of R6 as the source of the bank
> >is obviously in violation of basics because it is a motivator.
> 
> 
> As I view it the R6 is not the source of the bank, it is the bank.    It 
> is not a motivator, it can contain items that may be considered or used 
> as a motivator by the pc.  It also contains items that may have been 
> used as overts by the pc.  It is the dwindling spiral of stopped time, 
> with each goal leading into an opposition goal, a cross over eventually, 
> abandoning the goals, starting a new goal.  It is a record, and it is 
> the "truth" about the "lies" of time.

Overts or motivators after the fact of R6 would be dramatizations.
That was not what I was talking about.

Here I'm talking about recieving R6 in the first place.  In that,
the PC is at effect, hence my description of it as a motivator.

But as Ralph pointed out, the definition of R6 did shift around,
and there are various possibilities.  So let us consider them
individually.

1. There is the mass of implants which came up on in the R6EW
research and which eventually found their way onto OT 2.  Now
these are definitely a motivator.  This is the "R6" that Ron
refers to when he says that OT 3 Inc 2 contains the entirity
of R6.  Just implant items jammed down the beings throat by
force.

2. There is the clearing course implant.  Although this is much
earlier than Inc 2 (and also in my opinion earlier than Inc 1),
it is still a motivator because Ron says that there is "Protest"
against it in the early runs and eventually a mouth somatic.
So it is being done against the being's will and is therefore
a motivator.

3. I will also allow for the possiblity that there could be a
pattern which the being went into willfully for the sake of
a game or to have fun etc.  Something like that could have
been the intended target of the R6 research.  That would not
be a motivator because the being mocked it up himself on
purpose.  But if that is the case, then it was never found.

Note that I have run into things on the early track which
the being tossed himself into willfully (see the agreements
universe described in super scio for example), but they don't
seem to have a GPM pattern nor do they have the great significance
that was placed on R6.

But that does suggest to me that there could be an R6 like
thing in accordance with the third definition above.  If
so, then it is something that still needs to be researched,
because all that came out of the R6 research line at St. Hill
was implants.

 
> I don't know how the R6 relates to the upper sections of Scn.  They seem 
> to be two different areas of address.  Possibly the problem is that 
> sometimes a person gets in the valence of a stronger being, and then has 
> not only his own R6 bank but the confusion between himself and the 
> valence.  One could take this example and put it on a wider scale.

The orthodox interpretation seems to be that after clear one still
has copies of R6 from entities.  Hence they overrun Nots endlessly
as a solution to the fact that one still has a case at the top of
the bridge.

But let me also say that there is a clear state and also a solo
nots EP and that these are very high states, they are simply not
the end of case or abberation.

 
> The R6 is his own items and the opposition items.  I'm sure there would 
> be no problem in running R6 after the upper sections have been run.  
> Before then, probably just better to key it out and have a "Key-ed out 
> Clear".  Suggest that he does not mock it up again until he has done OT 
> III or Nots or something.
> 
> You can see the difficulty in trying to clear by doing R6 goals.  That 
> is why it eventually went to end-words, to knock out the bank, move the 
> person through, and get some separation of causation before approaching 
> it again.
> 
> The R6 bank is just that, a bank.  Not a motivator.  Not an overt.  Just 
> a record of a tn's existence.  It might even be called an identity in 
> itself, after all, it shows that a thetan has been, was, right?  That is 
> pretty important, I mean, that thetan exists now, in his own now, not 
> the physicial universe now, that doesn't give a lot of meaning, 
> significance and attachment.  But an entire R6 bank, well now we have 
> something...!!

Let us say that there is such a thing, not inflicted as a motivator
but simply a creation, perhaps identical from person to person
because we mocked it up in agreement with each other.

If so, then it would be a major case factor, well worth running.
In fact, it might be a significant factor in the solidity of
the reality that we are trapped in.

But a being would have to be pretty far decayed to get trapped
in such a thing.  It is complex and it is solid.  And so I would
still think late track, perhaps only going back a few universes.
See the "pattern of abberation" which I'm posting separately.
 
> Have fun:)
> 
> Pat
> 
> P.S.  You gave a lot of good answers on possiblities below...I'll leave 
> just enough in so you know to what I am refering.
> 
> 
> >That misbegotten theory was the true source of quickies.  And
> >notice that CofS made clears in the later days without needing to 
> >run R6 at all (although it is nice to get your confront up on it).
> >
> >There are many possibilities:
> >
> >a) Too many out lists during the GPM research era (Otto Roos 
> >suggested this and it is quite likely).
> 
> is great,
>
> >> it can sure be used to reach back track, progressively.
> in the area if he went solid
> >> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> 

I would be very interested if you have some comments or feelings
about what a real R6 might be.

There is something which has locked down reality and made it
all solid.

If your car gets a flat tire, you can't restore the tire by
running out the incident of running over the nail.

If somebody gets hit, we can turn off the pain by running
off engramic charge, undercutting the physical solidity and
removing a source that makes the pain worse.  Or we can blow
his non confront with a contact assist and turn off the pain.
Or we can blow entities who are contributing to the somatic.
Or run his overts.  Or any of a dozen other things that do
work.

But we can't run him so that he doesn't get an impact as
he is hit in a new unit of time by an actual physical force.

And yet that is possible.  I have had things like that happen.
But always as a keyed out OT manifestation which was unrepeatable.

Sorry to be raising questions instead of answers, but I
think that we are still on a research line.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================


 subj: Super Scio Tech - Continuing the Targ Discussion (attn Zero, Paul, etc.)


CONTINUING THE TARG DISCUSSION (Attn Zero, Paul, etc.)


On Fri, 05 Mar 1999 16:50:32 -0800, Ra <pthorn1@pacbell.net> wrote
in response to my earlier post on "Between Lives And Targs"

(note that Ra changed his ID and now posts as "zero")

>  Hello there Pilot:
>  Thought I would dissem some re:
>
>  The Pilot wrote:
>> 
>> BETWEEN LIVES AND TARGS
>===snip====
>> As soon as I remembered this black ring (thick like
>> a tiny donut), I just "knew" that it was called a
>> "Targ Ring".
>> 
>> Now that was strange because I had no reason for
>> associating Targs with the thing and the ring itself did
>> not seem to be composed of entities.
> 
> *As a note here, I have developed a score of rundowns to handle things
> all the way down the bridge. Most undercut the bank completely. Even the
> case completely. I have researched a number of things that I have
> decided in good consciousness not to release at all just yet. One has to
> do with running multiple auditing command cycles on multiple points in
> multiple dimensions. I have another 50 rundowns in note form.*

My advice is to write up everything you can as fast as you can
do so with accuracy and good quality.

I do sit on things waiting for another cog or hoping to see
things better, and I go over my technical posts a surprising number
of times, looking them over critically (wearing a Qual hat) before
sending them in.

But once something comes together right, get it written and
out there so that your attention can free up and shift onto
the next thing that needs to be looked at.

Trying to research leaves you with a wandering Itsa line that
can be overrestimulating unless you write your material up for
the sake of others.

The materials in the Super Scio book were accumulated over
a period of about ten years.  I would periodically bog and
go solid, sometimes for months or even a year.  Putting it
all together and getting it properly written up and straightened
out took about a year, and it was a tremendous case gain for
me to do so.

Since then I've known better than to sit on things.  And so
the stuff keeps coming faster and faster and the bogs and
overrestimulation just don't happen any more.

I think that Ron was in this situation, and the second he
began to hold data back and make it confidential it backlashed
and caved in on him.


> But you jumped in this area of ETargs. This is pretty high level stuff.
> I am not  suprised you had some problem handling them. Yeah, they know
> they are me, etc. Unfortunately, they do not have the same this
> universe agreements, and Usual Auditing Procedures slide off their back
> like water off of a duck.
> 
> The fact you spotted the ETarg ring, and knew what it was is the key to
> being able to handle them. So, I'll just address you at that level of
> awareness, and the rest will never even see this communication, probably
> not even the post.
> 
>> Very little has been said about Targs.
>> 
>> There is one LRH tape reference, the "electropychometic
>> scouting, battle of the universes" tape of 1952.
>> 
>> He associates them with Arslycus, which he also describes
>> as one of the few other between lives control areas
>> of the track in addition to recent earth.
>
> Very recent earth, like yesterday and early this morning. It is pretty
> much an ongoing operation.
> 
>> The Trags seem to be an entity type used in making
>> slaves.  It seems to me that the term "Targ Ridden"
>> (being infested with or even ridden or controled by
>> Targs) is associated with this but I'm not sure if Ron
>> used that term or it just poped into my head when I
> 
> It is telepathically given to you. The phrase wipes memory. If you
> start in on one of these guys, if you find a real one, a half second
> later you are running your commands on someone or something else. More
> than likely a mock up of you. Courtesy of yourself.

Entities acting as bouncers and forgetters.  Just like with engrams,
it stops happening if you're on gradient.

>> I've run a bit on Arslycus (see Super Scio) and it seems
>> to me that they wanted slaves and used between lives
>> control mechanisms and it now strikes me as quite likely
>> that the same mechanisms (Targs and Targ Rings and BLIs)
>> were used there as are now used here.  And Ron says
>> that this kind of control mechanism is not used in most
>> other times or places in this universe.
> 
> Actually, it is a little more accurate to say it is not used in this
> universe at all. The manifestation appears to be here, but the truth is,
> it is not. The Ring is a gateway to... hmm..... someplace different to
> put it lightly. That's why you couldn't find anything to run in the ring
> itself. Your intention just went through a worm hole to .. ah, nowhere,
> sort of. It sorta shifts phases of this universe to another.
> I had to invent and run some pretty strange math to figure this out.

Yes, a different space.  As to a different "universe", I use a
very broad definition of universe and so I would include it as
part of this one even though it is not part of the local 3 dimensional
space/time.
 
>> Filbert also mentions Targs.  He describes them (if
>> I remember right - It's somewhere in Excalibur Revisited)
>> as entities of exceptionally heavy black energy which are
>> expecially difficult to handle.
>
> Close, I will post the complete handling of his later.
> 
>> Since Ron did know about Targs and doesn't mention them in
>> Solo Nots, I'd pretty much assumed that they would just
>> blow with the rest of the stuff, so I hadn't gone hunting
>> very hard for Targs specifically or paid much attention
>> to this business.
>
> Nots wont even begin to touch them. Doubtful if they would ever even
> show up. If you managed to get an intention in the area, it would just
> be wormholed off to a no charge area, and meter wouldn't read.

Everything seems to fit the accessibility concept.  Things out
of the band don't read.  Things on the edge are hard to percieve
and bouncers etc. come into play.  When it moves up into full
accessibility, then you don't bounce or obey implanted orders
and it becomes fairly easy to handle.


>> The upshot of this is that I found a black ring in the
>> middle of the current body's head (a black theta energy
>> construction, not something you'd find with a scaple).
>> 
>> Concentrating on it, I tried to contact a Targ in the
>> body.
> 
> I think you were able to do this because of being able to somewhat
> think in multiple dimension, re: your jewel of the universe construct.

Yes.  But that is simply the accessibility gradient.  Everything
becomes easy eventually.

>> I found a large (almost body sized) thick black theta
>> body which answered up.  It was surprising that I had
>> had previously had zero perception of this thing despite
>> all the Nots and everything else.
>
>  Again the key was in being able to perceive in multiple dimensions.
>
>> This thing was quite willing to talk but various processes
>> seemed to have little effect.  ("yes I'm me, but so what,
>> I like being a Targ, lots of nice sensation").
>
>  Yep. Functionally, a mirror telepath. It reads your mind, and only
>  gives answers you yourself cannot handle.

That can only be done if you have a big bunch of flinches that
it can read and use against you.

In this case the question was simply not good enough, which is
a different point.  Obviously I didn't have any problem with
handling his answer, it simply indicated that these guys needed
something stronger than the Nots what/who.


>> I even tried "spot being made into a Targ" with little
>> effect.
>> 
>> The one that worked was "spot making another into a
>> Targ".
>> I was not one of these where you indicate and a few
>> impressions come back and they blow.  Instead I had
>> somebody running through a major incident in detail.
> 
>  Here, I think you got a bit of the extra 6th dimension of the ring. 

There is no reason to drag in the ring or the extra dimensions
to explain why he needed to do some real incident running.
In truth I do suspect that there was other dimensional cross 
copying of his running it going on, but who cares, if somebody
is running something, you just let them run it.


>> I only duplicated a small bit of it, but it had to
>> do with implanting these things among others:
>==snip===
>> stirring up a desire to be admired and making that
>> into a craving for power and riches etc.
>> 
>> I looked for another.  I only got a vague impression and
>> maybe ran a bit of dub-in until I mentally grabed that
>> black ring again (like holding it in a theta fist),
>> then I had another big solid black being with fairly
>> clear comm.  That was also very interesting.  It seems
>> like you can hardly find or percieve these guys unless
>> you clamp down on that ring somewhow, and then they
>> are extremely visible.
> 
> Yes, by holding the ring, you can make him visible, but you are not
> viewing normal mest. 
>
>> This time I needed to have him spot an earlier similar
>> time he made another into a Targ, but the making another
>> question seemed to be the basic handling without much
>> else.  And it went fairly fast this time.  And I noticed
>> that "To get vengance" was in the list of goals.
> 
> Not suprised. Btw, it looks like you ran the second command (e/s time)
> on the second ETarg, and not the first. Should have ran the first
> command on no.2, and then second command.

I did actually.  This was not a formal session writeup.  I
was simply making the observation that the second one needed
to go E/S.

After the first writeup, I ran some more, and they started
going on a fast blow by inspection on being asked to spot
making others into targs.  I suspect that there was a bunch
in close connection to each other and as one ran it, others
would watch and be getting their confront up.

> Wouldn't have made any diff anyway. The command went off to a mirror
> illusion universe, and the Targ wasn't there in the first place.

Doesn't matter.  If you are in contact with a being, then you
are in contact with them.
	
> Here is Mr Filberts handle:
> "E-TARG RUNDOWN
[snip]
>
> So, the handle is not to handle the Targ, but to handle the incident of
> you receiving him, r3r, good ol r3r.  It could or could not have been
> done in a Between Lives Implant.  The incident of the big light, and
> tribunal will blow down a couple of division on spotting it.  All the
> Targs will come into view, and have a fit, and the Black Ring will
> disappear. They are telepathic, and will hit you with your own pictures,
> and theirs, and whatever else they can find. Don't mess with the
> pictures, don't mess with the goals, and things that come up. Just run
> the incident.

I hadn't realized that he had bumped into the targ ring.  I read his
book a long time ago.

> Mr F wrote this with the assumption that the sequence of 1 to 17 had
> been run previously, that would include all ot levels, all entities,
> joiners, and all gpms, all circuits, prior universes, and rehabilitation
> of home universe. I personally think he was correct in placing this
> handling that far along.

Things come up when they come up.  Obviously I bumped into them
long after many other things had been handled.


> Here is the key. Grab the ring. That will activate the Targs. Count
> them, (6 for me) Assign a auditor attention unit to each. (Sort of like
> splitting self in 8) Locate the receipt incident, start r3r. (Will
> necessitate a couple more self splits)
> 
> Keep your attention on all 6 Targs, handle their origination's,
> intention attacks, picture and energy attacks while you run the
> incident. If they can find any loose bt's, or clusters, they will
> activate them as well, and key them in. Just assign another auditor
> attention unit to each bt woken up. They (targs) will attempt to escape
> through the ring when they realize the game is up. You can either let
> them, or hold them there. Once the incident is erased, they will calm
> down somewhat, and thereafter respond to standard auditing.

I didn't run into attacks, just some big black heavy beings.
But I've run off lots of stuff and this area was moving up
into the band of being "light" instead of "rough" to handle.

Running 6 in parrallel seems interesting, but I didn't find it
necessary.  Just hold onto one and get him through it.  But I
bumped into a need to run parrallels while fooling with the
big splitter in super scio chapter 9.  I would say now that
it was because it was out gradient and therefore the cross
copy between the beings was heavy enough to require handling
them together.  But if you're bigger, then your intention is
senior and overrides the cross copy that they are stuck in,
so you can hold one's attention and push him through.  The
others are still copying, so they catch this indirectly and
can then easily be blown.

Then again, drilling parallel processing is fun all by itself.
Worth doing at least once just for the hell of it.

> I have found that you can handle the ruds, and then r3r each one
> through the incident very nicely. They usually have pretty good
> cognition's, and quit r/sing. Could let them leave at that point, 
> up to you (most of mine didn't, wanted to hang around and get 
> some auditing). Then handle each bt or cluster woken up to ep.
> 
> If the targ is still around, and interested, have him spot a difference
> between himself and you, then a similarity, repetitive till ep. He will
> then be in valence, will leave, and you will not have the liability of a
> split self running around in a targ valence.
>
> I takes a quite a bit of confront, and the ability to handle 10
> auditing com cycles simultaneously. Heh. Somewhat of a trick, but you
> sure won't have any trouble auditing one being at a time after that.

True.

The "targ ring" really is a wormhole.  That was a smart observation.

So I drilled a bit with wormholes (separate action, no sense 
getting it mixed up with targs).  Pick a point in space, lets
call it point A.  Perhaps be there to some degree (if needed
for havingness & orientation).  Put out a beam to point B and
then unmock the beam alternately a few times, with the beam going 
through the intervening distance as is usual.

Next connect from point A to point B but force the connection
by postulate without crossing the intervening space, but
allow a tiny amount of distance to keep the two points
separated.  Drill mocking that up and unmocking it a few times.

Now put a bit of a pull from point B back towards point A
on that connection as you mock it up (or pulling on point B
from point A).  It makes a black ring in point B because 
things are pulled from there back towards point A.

This is a wormhole.  It is almost a black hole, but it goes
somewhere with a short tube that is far less than the distance
between the two points.  There is much fun to be had with these.
This is the next level above drilling with simple 3 dimensional 
beams.

Then I got back to handling targs and blew off some more as
I mentioned earlier.

Next I started looking around for Filbert's tribunal etc.
and also trying to follow the targ ring wormhole and making
copies of it and changing its color etc. until everything
seemed to fall into place.

It is a multipoint wormhole, like having a many to one named
pipe in server software (many users connecting to the same
address).  Billions of end points on one side, all connecting
to a single destination point.  The destiantion point is white 
rather than black because that is where the outflow side is, 
and it is brilliant white, that is the big light.

Where it exits is not the real place where we were sentenced
to Earth.  It is a copy (complete with a mocked up tribunal etc.).
And it is the entry point to the between lives implant sequence.

If you grab onto a body while you are still also holding
your current body, the ring in the current body exerts enough
pull to keep the ring in the other body from shifting you.

If, however, you are really between lives and grab onto the
ring of an unoccupied body (intending to pick it up), you get 
sucked down the wormhole and end up in the mockup of the
sentencing tribunal (which restimulates being sentenced to
Earth).  And there the targs blanket you and push you into
the BLI sequence.

That is what a targ does.  They blanket and enforce agreements.

If your big enough, you blanket them instead and they get easy
to handle.

And of course if you do a bit of drilling on mocking up
wormholes, you're not going to get pulled around by them
anymore (unless you feel like it).

And of course one should run a bit of charge off of times 
that they blanketed others and enforced agreements and emotions 
in on them.

But note that everything like this should be left until the
person starts bumping into it.  That's the easy way.

============


On 8 Mar 99, misiunas@freezoneamerica.org (Paul Misiunas) responded to Ra's
post with the following on "Pilot FYI:Between Lives And Targs"


# If auditing should be performed for the sake of auditing, then by all
# means, spot every known and unknown type of entity imaginable (and be
# sure to be creative and make up entirely "new" ones too!). That should
# keep you busy for... well, let's just say a long long time.
# 
# Target Tags, whether electronic or not, have their use, as do all
# entities, but sooner or later you'll tire of the "entity approach".
# 
# The "trick" isn't the number of comm cycles that you can hold with
# entities, or how well you can spot "worm holes", "dimensions",
# "mirrored illusion universe" or any other flowery spacation term. No
# matter the number of rundowns that you put yourself through, you will
# still not be able to escape yourself.
# 
# That's not to say that I don't believe some entities should be dealt
# with, it's just that making it a "life's work" will surely keep you
# busy and out of the way for a while.
# 
# Handle the incident and move on. Why "handle" the targs and that
# targs's targs and your split pieces targs, and your car's targs and 10
# targs all at the same time...
# 
# If the actual incident isn't handled, the targs won't be either. But
# sometimes handling the secondary is a better gradient for some.
# 
# That's my opinion. Your mileage will definitely vary.
# 
# Paul
# http://freezoneamerica.org
 
Paul makes a very good point.

One can go overboard on handling entities.

Handling them does make a difference.  I feel like I used to be 
muffled in cotton.

But they are never basic.  Under all these distractions its
always you, never an outside source.

When you do start running into them, then you get busy and
handle, but the target is to get them out of the way and get
back to running your own case.

If you bump into the targs because they are the next thing in
view and you're not assigning any cause to them but just handling
something which is in the way of seeing deeper, then they are
fairly easy to handle.  But if you were to dig these things
up with the attitude that they were doing things to you and
responsible for the condition that you are in (and one has
been effect of them, so its easy to do that), then you are
going to have one hell of a time handling them.

That could make the difference between spending years on
handling some type of entity instead of just doing a few
sessions to an automatic blow and a cog that puts you at
cause over them and beyond their ability to affect you.

This is important enough that I'm posting a separate writeup
on entity handling.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj: Super Scio Tech - Entity Handling


ENTITY HANDLING


Entities of whatever sort are not the basic why.

They do, however, intensify one's abberations and reduce
one's horsepower.

One can get into finding them at the bottom of every
rundown.  This is a mistake.  It actually distracts from
the effectiveness of the rundowns because one is busily
spotting other sources instead of handling one's own
causation in the area.

Let's take something as simple as the basic rudiments used
at the begining of every standard tech session - these are
ARC Breaks, PTPs (present time problems), and Missed Withholds.

At lower levels, they just handle these rudiments.  At upper
levels (OT 3 and above), they establish ownership (is the
out-rud your's, a BT's, or a cluster's).

If the person is being the effect of entities, you will find
that a lot of his out ruds are comming from entities on this
ownership step.

And yet, the entities are not basic on the PC's out-ruds,
and you will not get basics on these things while you are
continually directing the PC's attention to other sources
than himself.

The PC seems to hit bands or layers of entity created charge
as he works down through the "bank".  I'm talking here about
the entire band of accessibility rather than working through
the charge in a particular topic.  The entire band of 
accessibility suddenly jumps by an order of magnitude due to
something like having the clear cog (for real, not just 
knowing it abstractly) and the next thing accessible is
hoards of entities.

But these entities are a surface layer, the last thing
his case was burried under before some aspect of his case
went totally solid and out of his control.  Bascially, he's 
blown the case factors that were in the accessible band and 
the next thing that happens is that entities are leaking off 
of the next layer down.  And they are in the way.  He did
a total handing off of control to outside influences
and his own real basics are to some degree obscured and
out of reach because of this.

When he is in this state, one does need to establish
ownership because mostly he is misowning things coming
from entities.  Instead of having his own out ruds (which
still do exist), he's copying entity's out-ruds and living
those instead.

And yet it is just a smoke screen.  Think of it as a
cloud of fog which is now in the way of seeing the real
sources that he has deeper down.

If entities are poping up in all directions, then the thing
to do is to run entities instead of something else.  And
the best way is not to do high powered case handling rundowns 
while checking for ownership.  Instead you want to run
entities on a gradient until the pc ceases to be at effect
in this area.

One of our biggest early mistakes was in looking for the engram
necessary to resolve the case (and therefore trying to run
the heaviest engrams first) instead of running engrams on
a gradient with the intention of raising the pc's confront
of engrams in general.

The same goes for entity handling.  

What you really want is the easiest ones first rather than
the most difficult ones.

As is the case with engrams, these things are endless if
you stay down at a low level of confront.  And so it is
much more important to raise the pc's confront rather than
to handle some specific ones.

Best is to leave this be until the pc starts spotting them
himself.  Then handle the Nots case in the sequence that
he finds them rather than getting exotic about using other
rundowns.

Easiest at first is to find pressures and masses that are
being mocked up by BTs and then to find the BTs that are
mocking them up and blow them.  During this stage you will
find that he is being the effect of pictures and somatics
that BTs are mocking up and which he is misowning as his own.

But as he as wins on this and gets a bit bigger and smarter
in this area, their impingement ceases to be so solid and
they mainly just push his attention around, pulling it onto
things or pushing it off of things.

At this point you want to start using the basic solo nots
C/S which is to look for and blow BTs wherever your attention
is drawn to and on whatever your attention avoids.

You do this until you stop being affected by BT think.

Actually, what we have here is a scale of thought / emotion /
effort.  At first they are still capable of impinging with
effort, then that falls away and they only jerk one around
emotionally, and finally they are only impinging on a thought
level.  This raises the possibility of doing an emotional
handling (check for BTs inspiring emotions that you are feeling)
in between handling the masses and their effect on your
attention.

Now this could actually be very fast and easy if you don't
make the mistake of attributing your case to these guys,
but simply handle what is in your way until you get back to
being at cause instead of effect.

What you want to aim for is to be primarily handling by
inspection rather than needing any elaborate tools.  And
you will find that you get huge automatic blows of these
things as you move up to the point where you become cause
instead of effect.

Once you get past this first layer of entities and cease to
mistake their thoughts for your own, you should stop bothering
to establish ownership (mine, BT's, cluster's) as a formal
step in handling.  Instead, you just know in those rare
cases where some entities still show up on something.

Past this point, you will occasionally run into deeper 
layers of entitiy type case.  The thing is that when you
can spot it, you know immediately that it is not yours
because you are past this foolishness of misowning case.

Eventually you will run into machine entities and control
entities (watchers, monitors, etc.) of various sorts.
Sometimes you have to go through a brief period of getting
evangalistic about these and hunting them down until the
particular kind of thing falls away completely and ceases
to affect you.  

For these you often need an additional type of question 
which is in the form of:

a) spot being made into a ...
b) spot making others into a ...

You can get into much more complex handlings.  I certainly
have (there are some real complex handlings in super scio)
and I see others doing this too.  And there are all sorts of
tricks you can use like spotting early entry points (such as
incident 1) or running power on them or whatever.  Sometimes
these are a big help.

But looking at this from hindsight, it is mostly due to
picking up things out gradient, which is encouraged by
overrun and by mistakenly thinking that these things are
the why.

Whenever you get past a layer of this stuff, you always find
out that it was a minor factor and that they could only really
use your own case against you.

In general, when you bump into some sort of entity your basic 
handlings are:

0. Blow by inspection / acknowledgement
1. The simple Nots what/who
2. Point to the being you divided from
3. Spot being made into / making others into a ...

Note that cluster forming incidents, mass implants, etc., 
are really just specific cases of number 3 above.

The limitation is that this is dependent on having enough
confront, itsa, and willingness to grant beingness that
all the stops fall out of the way.

That gets messed up by stirring these things up out gradient
in a mistaken search for whys.

So have an easy time of it by handling your own case until
you bump into a layer of this stuff.  And then handle that
layer as itself instead of as a source for other things.  And
then get back to handling your own case again.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================


 subj: Super Scio Tech - A Grand Experiment


A GRAND EXPERIMENT


I make no claims about the following drill.  If questioned, 
I will claim that this is simply science fiction, presented 
for the amusement of ACT.

In fact, it was partially inspired by science fiction,
especially Jack Vance's novellete about the Telos, who
did an experiment like this and turned on OT abilities
(the details of the drill are not from his story, just
the concept).

The other inspiration comes from the methods of doing table
tipping seances (my family did a lot of that in my teens).

And so everyone is quite welcome to lable this as hokum.

But in case it should work, we had better take a lesson from
the average sci fi treatment and worry about some group
turning on OT abilities and then keeping the knowledge of
how to do that a big secret so that they can dominate the
world.

Therefore, just in case, it would seem wise to publish this
broadly where everybody can get it.

But it is probably just a fun experiment; a grand experiment.


=================

The cautions in the following drill are for trying to do
it for the first time.  Once a group has been successful,
they can probably get away with violating some of these
things.


1. Setup Actions

There should probably be at least 6 people.

It would be best if most or all the participants have 
done CCHs and upper indoc TRs first, especially hand/book 
mimicry and the ashtray drill.

All participants should be willing to see an object float
in the air.  If needed, just get them to talk about thier
considerations on this until they feel that they can have
it.  Note that they don't have to believe that it can 
happen, they simply have to decide that it would be alright
with them if it does.

The general attitude should preferably be one of seeking
wisdom rather than desiring power.  But don't get into
witch hunts, just clean up considerations.

The people who are to be involved should not be annoyed
or upset with each other.  It would not be a bad idea to
fly everybody's ruds before doing this, but that is not
a prerequisite.

Note that there is no requirement to be in an extremely
high case state or to meet extremely high ethical standards,
the participants simply have to be in good enough shape
that they are not actively opposing the drill.

Also, do not let anybody observe who has not yet done
the drill successfully themselves, because non-participants
can very easily block the effects, sometimes on an unconsious
basis without meaning to.  A team that has done this a
few times successufully can probably do it in the face
of opposition, but it is too much to ask of a beginning
group.

If some of the people involved have previously done the
drill successfully, it will significantly speed up the
process, but obviously this is not possible the first
time.


2. Preliminary Step

An object which is to be levitated is selected.  It should
have some mass, but not be heavier than any of the 
individuals can lift easily.

It should not be so fragile that it would break if dropped
from a few feet in the air.  For example, a solid glass 
ashtray would be acceptible but not a fragile one.
A book could be used, or a bottle which is either solid
or made of plastic.

Each participant should do a few cycles of TR8, intending
the object into the air and then lifting it up with
one's hand in a precise manner until they feel good
about putting intentions into the object and moving
it.

Also, somebody should be selected as a group leader who
will be in charge of starting each drill.  This is mainly
important for the second drill below.


3. First Drill

This must be done for at least an hour unless the EP is
reached sooner.  You may have to pass through a period
of boredom or disbelief.  It is a long run.  Having a
group helps immensly here because one does not want
to be the first one to give up or be blamed for letting
the group down.

It might be best to have a clock in view so that people
can assure themselves that the hour has not passed yet.
All should agree to keep it up for at least an hour
before starting.

The group forms a circle and everyone joins hands.
Breaking the circle breaks the flow, so nobody may
do so for any reason.  In the later step, if an object
is up in the air, letting go of somebody's hand does
cause the object to fall like a stone, so be comitted
to maintaining the integrity of the circle.

The circle is formed around the object to be levitated.

Either the participants are seated on the ground around
the object, or the object is on a table and the participants
are sitting in chairs around it, but in either case,
they are holding hands comfortably.

Before starting, ensure that the participants are
comfortable enough to remain in position for an hour.

Agree upon a command which names the object followed
by saying "up" as in "book go up" or "ashtray up"
or "bottle up" or whatever can be said in an easy
an repetative manner by the group.

The command is to be repeated over and over again by
the group in unison about once a second.

The group begins chanting this command, over and over
in a brisk manner.  The idea is to keep repeating the
intention in a new unit of time rather than to get
hypnotic or mesmerised.

The hand holding, chanting, and repeating of a single
agreed upon intention brings the group into agreement
and gradually pushes through whatever barriers the
individual members have against moving this object.

Furthermore, the overlapping potential of many 
individuals, each of whom have some areas that are
unblocked, allows each of the individual weaknesses
(blocked areas) to be bypassed by somebody else, so
that the composite can achieve what any one person
alone might not be able to do.

The drill is completed when the object floats into
the air.  At that point, move immediately to Drill 2
without breaking the circle or otherwise ending
cycle.  A win can be indicated by saying something
like "we've made it", but don't give a full stop.

However, once the object is in the air, the chanting
can come to an end.  Note that the chanting is not 
needed to keep it in the air.

Note that there will be no noticeable effect on
the object until it is ready to move.  You can chant
on and on with nothing happening and you should be
prepared to endure through this.  When the object
first twitches or tremebles, you are almost there.
This only happens within minutes of the object
levitiating, so be careful not to break the circle
at that point out of excitement or fear.  

When the object does finally go up in the air, it 
will do so cleanly and effortlessly.  The preliminary
twitches are a sign that the group created energy
field is starting to get a grip.  Once it does get
a grip, the control is very smooth.

When this does happen, everybody should try to keep
a good grip on their partners to prevent somebody
from accidentally breaking the circle.  Exclamations
of amazement and enjoyment are permitted, but move
on to the next drill quickly.


4. Second Drill

This is actually the important one.

The person who was assigned to be in charge selects one
of the team members and announces that they have control
of the floating object.

The person who has control of the object now begins to
move it around, in clean simple motions.  Everybody else 
does mimicry as explained in the CCHs, allowing him to
move it and following him and contributing to the motion.

Ideally the person should move the object by intention
alone.  But if he has trouble with this, he can announce
his intentions to the group so that they can help him
with this.

When he has a win and feels good, the group leader
selects another person to control the object.

The group leader should also be sure and take a turn
at controlling the object himself.  Everybody should
get at least one turn before ending the session.

The idea is to build up each individual's ability 
to move an object by thought alone.

If the members feel up to it and agree on it, they
can each do a second turn if desired.


5. Advanced Drills

The above two stage drilling is done a number of times.
Varying the goup is permitted, but note that if the
same group does this a second time after a successful
first attempt, it is expected that the object will 
move into the air much sooner.

Once the second drill is achived quickly and the
members can easily move the object by thought alone,
more advanced drills can be tried.

Drill three is to have a second object available.
Put the first object down and then shift to the
second one.  It should be possible to get it up
into the air fairly easily since the group energy 
field is already established.  If necessary do a
chant for a few minutes.  Then each member in turn
controls moving it up and down.  Then put it down 
and lift the first object again as a group.
Alternate betwen the two objects until you can
simply shift by agreement between the two without
any need for chanting.

Drill four is to gradually separate hands, subsituting
a mental, telepathic line, while keeping the object
in the air.  At first it might help to chant together
while doing this, and only one pair of hands should
be separated initially.  Eventually you should be
able to hold it in the air without physical contact.

Drill five is to have the individuals go to separate
areas of the room and move objects of their choice
by themselves while trying to tap the group agreement
on a telepathic level.


===============

Summary:

The above is a grand experiment.  I cannot guarantee
results.  And yet, to get any results you will probably
have to mock up a great deal of certainty and give this
a really hard group push.

At a minimum, if you do this with real determination,
I think that you will at least see an object float in
the air.  That does wonders for one's certainty in
spiritual matters.  I have that from table tipping
seances when I was young (just family, no outside
charletans involved).  But we used to foolishly read
the racing form to the floating table, asking it to
bob on the correct horse.  And we always got wrong 
answers.  I think that drill 2 above is the right
way to use this effect.  We never thought of doing
that.

But of course this is all just science fiction.


Have Fun,

The Pilot
 
==========================================

 subj: Super Scio Tech - SEQUENCE OF ABBERATION


SEQUENCE OF ABBERATION


I have occasionally said something about one type of abberation
leading to another.  I think that all the mechanisms can be laid
out in a sequence with each one developing in response to the
previous one.

Once a mechanism is in place, all the more basic abberations
lock up on it further, so that it is hard to see which one is
more basic in present time.  To sort this out, you need to consider 
an early track period where the later mechanisms were not operative.

For example, problems are more basic than overts.  Many types
of non-confront could lead to a persistance which results in
a problem.  Eventually, one begins to commit overts to solve 
problems.  Once that occurs, more problems will build up on
the non-confronts engendered by the overts.  To see the logic
of this, you have to consider if one would commit overts in
the absense of problems or if, on the other hand, one could
have problems in the absense of overts.

And in a similar manner, one could have non-confronts for
many reasons which do not involve problems, but one would
not have a problem unless one was already non-confronting
something.  Hence, non-confronts are more basic.  But once
the being does have problems, that will cause him to non-confront
more things.

Therefore it should be possible to lay out the various
abberative mechanics in a sequence.  One begins from a
godlike being that has no considerations or limitations and
cannot be hurt or hit with force and carries it down through
more and more complex and overwhelming abberative mechanics
until one reaches the late complex ones.

I've taken a stab at this many times, but I always feel a
bit unsatisfied.

Rather than sit on this any longer, I felt that I should put
out what I do have and ask for suggestions as to things that
are missing or errors in sequence or mixing in things that
are not of comparable magnitude.

So here it is for comments and suggestions.

----------

Section A: The Beginning

This first section is not really abberative.

1. First there is Static.  Neither one nor many.

2. Then there is the concept and creation of separation 
which could be thought of as imposing space or space/time
(time is a different style of separating things).  And
since nothing else exists, it is the static itself which
separates.

3. Next we have Concieve / Create / Communicate.  Here one
is adding to the richness of creation and since there are
other beings (other separations from static) and since they
are separate from each other, communication naturally comes
into play.

Until the above are in place, ARC as we know it would be
undefined.  Static is a singularity (by which I mean a
hole in the equation rather than saying that it is one -
it is neither one nor many in the normal sense) and
therefore could not have ARC because there is nothing
there to have ARC with.  At the same time, it could not
have no-ARC either because there is also nothing to have
no-ARC with.

For affinity, one needs to concieve of likeing some things
more than others.  And reality would involve sharing
creations.  Hence these begin to come into play after
the 3 Cs above.  At first one would exchange and copy
everything and then gradually one would become selective.

And so the ARC begins from a completeness which is the
singularity and then has to diminish slightly from an
absolute as part of separating from static.

At this level, there would not be Be/Do/Have as we know
it.  There is no need for havingness when one creates what
one wishes without restriction because there is no need to
keep anything around.  In a similar manner there is no
fixed Be or Do.  Instead there is just continuous create,
with transient be/do/have as a side effect.

Note that communication processes are not generally
distructive of havingness even though they should be
in theory because they can dissolve mass.  This implies
that communication is more basic than havingness.

The KRC triangle also has no need for existance except
as transients in the continuous create.  There is no
question of control when one just creates what one wants,
and there is no question of responsibility in an atmosphere
where it is not yet possible to commit an overt.

Many of our basics are not yet operative in this "time".  
But affinity does become a factor.  Note that it starts from 
an absolute and then slips slightly as a side effect of the 
introduction of distance between beings who are individually 
concieving and creating and exchanging things.

But a slight slip in affinity or communication is not really 
abberative as long as it is not fixed on any line but continues 
to shift so that all lines flow at one time or another.

If you process in the direction of out-ARC or out-comm or
out-affinity, the PC gets worse.  However, if you process
in the direction of disagreement (out-agree), the PC
improves (this is a keynote of the doctorate course).

This would imply that at basic, ARC is not locked into a
triangle.  You can have high communication and affinity
without haveing to be in agreement.  In fact the mocking
up of different realities instead of a single agreed upon
reality would bring about more interest and more communication 
between beings.

But note that there is a sort of R in ARC even at the
start, however it is an R involving duplicating other's 
realities without at the same time having any need to agree 
with them, nor any need to get agreement from others on
one's own realities.

At this level there is also the assignment of location
(orientation in space) and sequence (orientation in time).
But note that these are willfull rather than fixed.  The
being generates spaces and timestreams rather than being
trapped within them.  But since there is a space/time
orientation implied in the original separation, there is
always a higher space above space and a higher time above
time.  At the top, the time-like separation is the before 
and after separating and the space-like separation is 
the separation itself.

----------

SECTION B: THE WILLFUL SEMI-ABBERATIONS

I'm uncertain of the order of events here and suspect that
I'm missing some factors.


4. Willfull assignment of external cause

To allow communication between the separated semi-statics, one
must permit others to create in one's space.


5. Willfull choices to not communciate

The being has to cut back from absolute comm and duplication
to keep from being everybody at once.  This is fine as long
as all lines are allowed to flow eventually, but leaves the
door opened for trouble in areas that are not flowing at the
moment.

6. Willful choices to dislike (out-affinity)

This is most likely to happen on lines that have not flowed
in some time (temporary willful out-communication).

Note that willful choices to disagree are non-abberative
as long as communication is present per the earlier discussion
on disagree running as a positive rather than a reverse
process.

7. Not-know

To avoid duplicating everything and to add surprise and
variety, one makes decisions to not-know some things.
Again, this is fine as long as it is transient and not
fixed as a permanent not-know.

8. Not-Remember

This is really a variation on not-know.  It is really just
not knowing the past.  Again, one does it for surprise and
variety.

9. Not-Confront

This is another area where one can make willfull choices for 
fun and only risks abberation if it becomes fixed rather than
transitory.

All of the above are in this section because they will
process successfully by simply getting the person to
do it (communicate or confront or recall or whatever)
without worrying about why he isn't confronting or why
he doesn't want to talk.  In other words, he can push
these through on postulate alone.  Therefore they are more
basic than any persistant abberations.


----------

SECTION C - THE FIRST REAL ABBERATIONS

When willful abberations are present in a transient
state, it is possible to fall into this next series.  One
could avoid that by intentionally reversing the willfull
abberations when these next factors show up, but this
next set encourages one to do the opposite and make things
worse.

10. Protest

In the presence of out-comm etc., it is possible for one
to recieve a creation which one does not want and that opens
the door to protesting something.  If one is protesting, one
can't as-is.  The correct solution is to reopen create and
communicate in the area, but if one mocks up the protest
strongly instead, it reduces the ability to create and
communicate.

Protest results in there being things one is unwilling to
create.

11. Invalidation

Eventually one wants to invalidate beings whose creations
one is protesting.  And once they also have things that
they are protesting, they have blocks in creativity which
they can be invalidated for.

The most basic invalidations are invalidations of the being's
cretions and his ability to create.

12. Withholds

The most basic withholds are to avoid invalidation.

True overts as we know them now do not yet exist because
nothing can be hurt.  But one withholds the action of
creating something that would be invalidated or one
withholds the fact that one has created it so as to avoid
invalidation.

Also, comm is further cut by withholds, leading to more
non-confronts, protest, and invalidation.

13. Restrained Create

To avoid having withholds, the being now reduces his ability
to create so that he will not mock up things which he then
has to withhold.


14. Knowing without Creating

To handle inval and protest, one now wants to be able to
know things in the areas affected without at the same time
being willing to create those areas.  This introduces
alter-is and launches one onto the K to M scale.


---------------

SECTION D - THE SOLID ABBERATIONS

15. Failed Create

The accumulation of invalidations, the continual reduced
willingness due to protest, the alter-is introduced by
approximate instead of creative knowingness, and the
attendant increase in willful out-comm etc. eventually
leads to a failure to create something.

This is the first point where he is really in trouble
rather than just playing.


16. Need for Agreement

The solution to a failure to create is to get others to
help create it and for that one needs their agreement.

One tries to use communication and other's affinity
to gain agreement and the ARC triangle eventually locks 
into place.

One is now in the trap of having to have agreement.


17. The Need To Be

To get agreement, one must to some degree fix one's
beingness instead of shifting around and being anything
from moment to moment.


18. The Need for Havingness

Because one can't create everything, those things which
one cannot create at will need to be kept around.
This is a solution to failed create.  It is also a
solution to failed beingness, if one fails to be something
by postulate, then one trys to have the things that go
with that beingness so that others will agree to the
beingness.


19. The Need for Doingness

High on the scale, instead of doing something to produce
something, one just creates it the way one wants, and
when one wants it a different way, then one creates that.

But as the ability to create gets blocked, one engages in 
doingness as a solution to how to gain havingness.

It is as this point that the Be-Do-Have triangle becomes
effective.

Be-Do-Have leads to games, but at this point these are
still light games rather than fixated ones.

The above section might develope during what I refer to
as the reality wars in the cosmic history section of
Super Scio.

Note that the KRC triangle is still not fully operative.  There
is no serious concept of responsibility at this level because 
there is no concept of irresponsibility.  One still creates
what one creates.


----------------

SECTION E. THE GRADES ABBERATIONS

20. Problems

Early problems are attempts to handle be/do/have in
the presence of out-comm, non-confront, and failures
to create.


21. Overts

Early overts are comitted to solve problems.


22. Out-Responsibility

This might better be termed the assignment of other causation.
Having regretted the fact of an overt, one shifts the
reponsibility over to others.  It is at this point that
the KRC triangle becomes solid.


23. Enforce/Inhibit

One begins to enforce and inhibit in an attempt to handle 
out-responsiiblity.


24. ARC Breaks

Because of enforce, inhibit and overts, one begins to
have ARC breaks.  The basic ones are probably on enforced
agreement (reality) since communciation and affinity are
close to theta and tend to have a dissolving effect on
abberations.


25. Justifications

One starts to justify to handle the ARC Breaks which come
about because of overts one has comitted.


26. Right/Wrong

When one fails to justify oneself to others, one then
justifies the matter to oneself by insisting that one
is right and the others are wrong, hence the development
of early service facs (not GPM derrived ones).


27. Help

Once one has failed even in justifying one's overts to
oneself, one begins to help in an effort to make amends.
Note that true help in the sense of contributing to others
creations exists earlier.  This is abberated help, done
in the face of irresponsibility.



--------------

SECTION F.  THE ADVANCED ABBERATIONS

Here I am a bit uncertain of the sequence.

28. Sources

To avoid responsibility, one begins to assign other sources.


29. Codes

To solve out-responsibility, one begins to mockup codes
to live by.


30. Not-Isness

Because one violates ones codes, one begins to not-is.


31. Randomity and Complexity

Because one is not-ising, one now has difficulty with
too much randomity and complexity.  One begins to be
overwhelmed by quantity.


32.Reality Frames

To cut down randomity, one focuses things down into 
reality frames which are more ordered and limited in
their interactions.


33. Machinery and Automaticity

Also to cut down randomity and to work around the fact of
not-isness and to handle the complexities of keeping frames
mocked up without having to confront the complexity, one
begins to use machinery and automaticities.


34. Games

In keeping with the above, one mocks up more formalized
game patterns with roles (terminals) and goals that
are held more ridgidly.

The above all develope prior to the fall of home universe.

-----------------

SECTION G. THE PAINFUL ABBERATIONS

35. Abberated Control (Implanting)

Due to the abberative factors above, one now sees others as
responsible for the condition that one is in, and therefore
seeks to control others to enforce agreement.

Implants come into use in the form of high asthetics combined
with trickery, note that it is not yet possible to use force
against a being but only against his mockups.


36. Loss

With formalized games comes the idea of a winner and a
looser.  And with the evolving complexity and an increasing
inability to create comes the possibility of having things
that one feels one could never create again.

This makes it possible to suffer losses.

The overwhelming loss is the fall of home universe.

At this point the emotional tone scale also comes into
play (as opposed to random uses of emotion).


37. The Rock

As a solution to loss, one mocks up solidities which are
supposed to be the being (instead of just projecting things)
but which are actually substitutes for oneself.  Note that
the fall of home universe is the zero point for a being,
after this he operates as matter and energy instead of as
a pure creative force.


38. No Change

To prevent further losses, decay, and destruction, he begins
to resist change.


39. Protect

Failing to resist change, he begins to protect.

Eventually he begins to protect the rock and hides it
behind a mask.  He attempts to protect his creations in
general and fails.  He also begins to protect others.


40. Symbols

Once he has failed to protect and help, he solves loss
by substituting things, and especially he begins to
subsitute symbols for things.


41. Pain

He creates pain to warn himself of loss.


42. Engrams

He begins collecting pictures of painful incidents to prevent
them from happening again.


-------------------

H. THE COMPLEX ABBERATIONS

43. Force

Carrying engrams, the being becomes the effect of force.

44. Implanting by force

Being affected by force and being capable of affecting others
by force, the being now uses implanting by force (instead of
by asthetics) to enforce agreement and so decays further.

45. Unconscious divisions

The being could always occupy many viewpoints or divide his
attention and operational points, being both one and many.

But if one of his operating points is overwhelmed and forced
into agreement, he does not want the others to recieve the
implant or the enforcement in parallel, and so he now creates
heavy partitions and divides in a manner that leaves the
parts unconsious of each other so that all will not fall if
one is implanted.


46. Use of BTs

The being now pushes fragments of himself onto others to
control them and is in turn abberated by fragments of others.
Eventually this also becomes as subject for implanting.


44. Valences

Being affected by force and entities, the being now flinches 
from occupying the effect point and substitutes identities 
for himself.


45. Goals

Being isolated in individual identities/viewpoints/valences,
and having those smashed, he now solves the problem of how
to achieve something by postulating goals that span across
multiple identities.

46. GPMs

Seeing that his goals still fail, he postulates the identities
as solutions to the opposition which he believes to be
external to himself and out of his control.

Up until this point, the abberations and implants are still
simple decay scales.  But here we finally get the double
sided terminal - opterm pattern.  And of course the actual
use of it as a solution is followed by implanting false
patterns.

This probably begins about 3 universes back.

-------------

I. THE UNCONSIOUS ABBERATIONS


47. Unconsciousness of self

With GPMs, one progresses through beingnesses that one later
detests and opposes.  And because of fragmentation, one 
has fragments or theta lines which are in different GPMs
and hence oneself in one viewpoint can find oneself in another
viewpoint that one detests.  

This is enough to knock out any last vestiges of awareness
in any higher viewpoints from which one is creating lesser
viewpoints or identities.


48. Compulsive Create

Since one is still creating to balance the nothingness,
but one is no longer conscious of creating, the creations
become unknowing and compulsive.


49. Trapped in Reality

Since one is no longer controlling what is mocked up, one
becomes trapped within it.  The compulsive create brings
about a chaos of creations which one solves by freezing
everything down to one reality.


50. Solidification

With the compulsive create of reality, all of the above solidify
and invert.

Now one has, for example, the fact of painful impingement
even when one is confronting a present time force that is 
impinging on one rather than simply having the engramic
somatics that derrive from cumulative non-confront.

There is much more here.  Things which were "would be nice"
or "sometimes interesting" became compulsions and then 
passed beyond that into physical laws.

This has been the anatomy of this universe and the one
before it (the magic unvierse) as well.

Think of a liquid with particles and solidities but which
was none the less in motion and capable of being stirred
and manipulated.  And then it solidifies, as in making
Jello.

===========

The above is a beginning sketch.  I can wrestle with
the exact sequence and with which factors should or shouldn't
be included.

When I wrote this, the thing that struck me most was
locking down the ARC triangle.

Affinity and communication are basics, highly desirable
to all beings.  Compulsive agreement, on the other hand,
leads to the solidification of reality and complete entrappment.

It seems like the first trap was to make people think that
they were supposed to agree just because they liked someone
or something and were in communication with it.

This suggests the following process:

"Spot something or somebody which you could like while disagreeing
with it or them".

Also -

"Spot somebody who you could have likeing you without requiring
their agreement".

"Spot something that another could like without having to
agree with it".

Etc.

This immediately makes me think of watching an enjoyable
horror movie without having any need or desire to agree
with the reality presented.

It also makes me think of talking with the critics on ARS
where there are some whom I enjoy talking with and have
affinity for but certainly don't agree with on various things
related to the tech.

The compulsion to agree is probably rooted in trying to compel
others to agree.

Go to a crowded place, spot individual people and get the
idea of their disagreeing with you but liking you anyway.


Hope this helps,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj: Super Scio (reformatted) MASTER LIST OF MATERIALS OF THE R6 ERA

I decided to change the spaces to dashes to improve
formatting, and I thought that I should add it to the
archive.

Best,

The Pilot

===============


MASTER LIST OF MATERIALS OF THE R6 ERA  (1963-1965)

(Updated to use "-" instead of blanks to improve the
appearance in fonts with proportional spacing)

The Bulletins related to R6 (Routine 6 or level 6 - The 
research line leading up to the clearing course) were not 
initially considered to be confidential and therefore the 
issues were copyrighted individually.  The recent posting 
of the copyright lists on the net makes it possible to build 
a composite master list of the materials of this period based 
on the old and new tech volumes, the old OEC volumes, and 
the master list of currently acknowledged non-confidential 
materials which is (or was) available at www.scientology.org.

Note that the GPM materials of this era were originaly labled
as Routine 3 (R3), meaning that they were run at level 3 (the
highest level at that time).  In late 1964, the lineup was
extended to 4 levels and most of the R3 processes (except R3R) 
were moved up to level 4 and renamed R4.

Eventually the bridge expanded again and the GPM materials
were moved up to level 6 and the designation R6 came into
effect.  This eventually led to the R6EW solo process but
initially R6 was a co-audited successor to the R3/R4 processes.

When confidentiality was first put in around 1965, the
entire GPM research line was treated as confidential.
This was soon eased up to allow access to the early R3 
materials (processes from R3A up to R3GAXX) and the bulletins
on these were included in the old tech volumes (1975 era).

By the time of the New tech volumes (1990 timeframe), the
remaining R3/R4 materials (R3M etc.) were declassified and
included in the volumes.  This included things such as the
Helatrobus implant platens which are in new tech volume VII.
This was supposedly ordered by Ron back in the late 1970s
and at that time the tapes that go along with these materials
were put back on the SHSBC.

Although the new tech volumes finally made the R4 materials
available, they suffer from a different problem which is that
they do not include the historical progression of revisions
and replacements which can be found in the old tech volumes.
So in the cases where one bulletin replaced another, the
older version is not in the new tech volumes, and if it used
to be considered confidential, then it is not in the old
volumes either even if it is of research interest.

The R6 materials of 1964 remain confidential at this time 
and appear in neither set of tech volumes.  Although the
names of the corresponding tapes were in the old tech volumes,
the bulletin dates and titles have been unknown until the
copyright lists were posted recently.

Note that the tapes of this time period are covered in the
tape master list which I issued last year.


KEY:

COLUMN 1: (old volumes)

O = In old tech volumes (V5 = 1962-4, V6 = 1965-9)
P = In old OEC volumes
> = still confidential (probably)
* = Indexed in old OECs but omitted (limited distribution or 
       confidential policy?)
? = Not even indexed in the old OEC but included in the copyright list

 - = not in old vols but available in the new ones,
  (but HCOILs, HCOELs, SecEds, etc. were never collected into
  (volumes, so these are blank except for the occasional ones in 
  (the tech volumes)

: = commentary from the official master list

COLUMN 2: (new volumes)

T = IN NEW TECH VOLUMES (1963-65 = New Tech Vol VII)
M = On the official master list.  These might all be in
    the new OEC volumes.
 - = omitted from new materials, probably because of later
replacements or confidentiality.


COLUMN 3: (copyright lists)

C = appears in one of the copyright lists that were posted
recently to the internet.


COLUMN 4:

$ = posted to the net (scamizdat etc.)

Note that all of old tech volumes 5 & 6, marked O in column 1, were
also posted to the net (these are not marked $ to make the list
easier to read)


ABBREVIATIONS:

HCO = Hubbard Communications Office
HCOB  = HCO Bulletin (tech)
HCOPL = HCO Policy Letter
HCOAL = HCO Admin Letter
HCOIL = HCO Info Letter
HCOEL = HCO Exec Letter
TAL   = Tech Advice Letter
SECED = Secretarial Executive Directive
BPL   = Board Policy Letter
BTB   = Board Technical Bulleting

The BPLs and BTBs were only used in the early 1970s.  At that
time, many HCOPLs and HCOBs that were identified as not being
by RON were reissued as BPLs or BTBs respectively.  Any that
are labled that way here were HCOBs etc. at the time they were
issued.  

Some HCOBs were left out of the tech volumes for reasons of
confidentiality, but a few may have been left out because they
became BTBs.  They are marked here by adding (BTB?)

r. generally means revised (or reissued).  Usually only the last
revised date is shown (along with the original date) to avoid
presenting a long revision history.

In the few cases where something was issued both as an HCOB and as
an HCOPL (to ensure its use in both tech and policy), I have listed
it as an HCOB.

In the few cases where an HCOPL appears in the old tech volumes as
well as in the old OEC volumes, I have listed it as being in the
tech volumes and it can be assumed to be in the OEC as well.

During this time period there was a "reissue" series where older
HCOBs, etc. were being reissued as policy.  These are listed as
Reiss. ## (reissue series number) and the original date will be
in parenthesis following the title.  

Most series designations such as the KSW Series or FSM series were
created in the 1970s and were retrofitted to the older policies,
hence there are a few high numbered series designations on these
older materials.

What are now called Missions were called Franchises in this
time period.  Later (after the old OEC volumes were issued) the 
word Franchise was changed to Mission in those policies.

The HCOIL (Info Letters) were mainly issued in the 1962-4
timeframe.  Some ended up in the tech volumes, but most did not.
These include the "Ron's Journals" which were informative and
give one a feeling for the time period (I read some of them
years ago) but do not generally contain any electrifying data.
The Info Letteres were discontinued in favor of Executive
Letters (HCOEL) in 1964.  Those in turn were discontinued in
favor of LRH EDs in the late sixties.  In all cases the issues
are blue on while.  There were a set of blue volumes issued
around the early eighties, but they only covered LRH EDs and
not the earlier ILs and ELs.

There were never more than a handfull of documents issued as
oddball types such as Tech Advice Letters.

The notation "canc per OEC" means that they are in the cancelled
list at the back of the old OEC volume index but did not
have an explicit cancellation reference.

Some titles have been abbreviated.

There may be a few errors, especially in marking C (copyright) on
the HCOPLs since there were many in random order in the posted list.

I do not have a complete list of BTBs for this timeperiod, but
I believe that there were very few.  The OEC provided a complete
list of BPLs and there were only a handfull.

There are probably other confidential issues besides those which were
copyrighted.  I would assume that at a minimum there are grade V and CC
materials in 1965.  And note that the copyright list also includes
registration of packs of materials by year and by level which 
contained materials in bulk.

Sometimes there is a I, II, III, IV etc. used to distinguish
multiple bulletins issued on the same date.


=============== 1963 ===================

: Scientology: Complete List of Books and Materials of 1963

: While keeping the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course roaring 
: ahead, LRH embarked on what he called "the most intense period 
: of research I've yet done."
: In addition to his work in the technical line, Mr. Hubbard made 
: great strides in the field of administration newly defining the 
: activities of auditors and organizations across the world.
: 
: Hubbard British Mark V E-Meter
: A new British Mark V E-Meter became available in 1963 with double 
: the sensitivity of the first Mark V. The Mark IV and Mark V were 
: both in use from 1963 through 1965. The Mark IV was discontinued 
: in December 1965.


OTC HCOB   1 Jan Academy Curriculum, How to Teach Auditing and Routine 2
P-- HCOPL  1 Jan Objective Three Celebrities
OTC HCOB   3 Jan Opposition Lists, Right and Wrong Oppose
-MC HCOPL  4 Jan Pattern of District Office (canc. per OEC)
--C HCOIL  5 Jan a statement by L. Ron Hubbard for the press
--C HCOIL  8 Jan Ron's journal no. 3
--C HCOIL 10 Jan t.v. demonstration of t.r's
--C BTB   14 Jan rings causing "rock slams"
>-C HCOB  14 Jan definition of release (see 9 Aug 63)
--C HCOIL 15 Jan the DC situation
PTC HCOPL 15 Jan Routine 2-12
-MC HCOIL 16 Jan Our Role in the World
P-- HCOPL 22 Jan Reissue Ser 9 Hats & Other Folders (reiss of PL 15 Sep 59)
OT- HCOB  27 Jan Routine 2 Simplified
-TC HCOB   1 Feb Routine 3, Urgent, All Cl III and IV Auditors
--- HCOPL  1 Feb HCO Area 5%s (canc. per OEC)
--- HCOPL  6 Feb HCO Area 5%s (canc. per OEC)
P-C HCOPL  7 Feb Reiss Ser 10 Organization of Corporations (PL 28 Jul 59)
PT- HCOPL  8 Feb Curriculum Change
PMC HCOPL  9 Feb Saint Hill Course Goals
OTC HCOB  11 Feb Current Auditing
PMC HCOPL 11 Feb Auditing Regulations
O-- HCOB  12 Feb R2-12,3-21,and 3GAXX-Tiger Drilling for Nulling by Mid Ruds
PTC HCOPL 13 Feb I V Unit
PMC HCOPL 13 Feb II Academy Taught Processes
P-- HCOPL 13 Feb 10% Due To WW
P-C HCOPL 14 Feb SHSBC Reimbursement Arrangements
P-C HCOPL 14 Feb How to Examine; Theory Examinations
P-C HCOPL 14 Feb The Establishment of Central Orgs Control Areas
OTC HCOB  15 Feb R2-R3, Listing Rules
--C HCOIL 17 Feb Ron's journal no. 4
P-- HCOPL 19 Feb Classification of Central Orgs Control Areas
O-C HCOB  20 Feb R 2 & 3 Model Session (cancelled by HCOB 21 May 63)
--- HCOPL 20 Feb The evolution of a District Office (canc. per OEC)
--- HCOPL 21 Feb The evolution of a District Office (canc. per OEC)
OTC HCOPL 21 Feb Goals Check
-TC HCOB  22 Feb Routine 3M, Rundown by Steps
P-C HCOPL 22 Feb Clear Test 1963
--C HCOIL 22 Feb to magazines
*-- HCOPL 25 Feb South Africa Personnel Directory
PMC HCOPL 25 Feb R2-R3
P-- HCOPL 28 Feb Deputy HCO WW Exec Sec
OTC HCOB   4 Mar Routine 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A
PM- HCOPL  6 Mar Selling Techniques Forbidden
-TC HCOB   6 Mar Correction to HCO Bulletin of February 22, 1963
PM- HCOPL  6 Mar R3M, HCO WW Form G3, Revised, Fast Goals Check
--C HCOIL  7 Mar Ron's journal no 5
OTC HCOB   8 Mar Use of the Big Middle Rudiments
--C HCOAL  8 Mar operation of British mark V E-meter
-TC HCOB   9 Mar Routine 2 and 3M, Correction to 3M Steps 13, 14
OTC HCOB  10 Mar R2-10, 2-12, 2-12A (Also applies to R3M), Vanished R/S or RR
PM- HCOPL 12 Mar Staff Personnel Allowance, Saint Hill
PMC HCOPL 13 Mar Amnesty
>-C HCOB  13 Mar urgent routines 2 & 3M addl. correction to 3m steps 13, 14
-TC HCOB  13 Mar II The End of a GPM
OTC HCOB  14 Mar Routine 2-Routine 3, ARC Breaks, Handling Of
PMC HCOPL 15 Mar II Checksheet Rating System
P-C HCOPL 15 Mar Org Despatch Routings To/From USA/Canada
-TC HCOB  17 Mar R2-R3, Corrections, Typographicals and Added Notes
OTC HCOB  18 Mar R2-R3, Important Data, Don't Force the Pc
--- HCOPL 18 Mar District Office Testing (canc per OEC)
PM- HCOPL 20 Mar I HCO WW Electric Stencil-Cutting Machine
PM- HCOPL 20 Mar II Self-determinism in Central Organizations
OTC HCOB  23 Mar Clear and OT
PMC HCOPL 23 Mar I Clear Test 1963, Issue II
PM- HCOPL 23 Mar II Policies in Force, Org/Assoc Secs, HCO Secs
PTC HCOPL 23 Mar III Classification of Auditors, Class II and Goals
P-C HCOPL 25 Mar Reiss Ser 11 A Model Hat For an Executive (PL 19 Sep 58)
PMC HCOPL 29 Mar Clear Requirement
>-C HCOB  29 Mar Summary of Sec Checking (BTB?)
-TC HCOB  30 Mar Routine 3M Simplified
PM- HCOPL  2 Apr Construction Information
P-- HCOPL  2 Apr Food & Cleaning Regulations Students
-TC HCOB   2 Apr Diagrams Illustrating Tape of 28 March 1963
PM- HCOPL  4 Apr II Director of Training Weekly Student Interviews
P-- HCOPL  4 Apr Important Changes in Tech Reports to WW
P-C HCOPL  4 Apr District Offices Tech Reports To WW
P-- HCOPL  4 Apr HCO Tech Sec WW Disbanded
PMC HCOPL  5 Apr Organization Students on Saint Hill Course
P-- HCOPL  5 Apr Audit of Organizational books (canc 21 Jan 68)
-TC HCOB   6 Apr R3M2, What You Are Trying to Do in Clearing
-TC HCOB   8 Apr I Routine 3M2, Listing and Nulling
-TC HCOB   8 Apr II Routine 3M2, Corrected Line Plots
P-C HCOPL 10 Apr Reiss ser 12 What an exec Wants on His Lines (PL 26 May 59)
P-- HCOPL 11 Apr Org Despatch Routings USA/Canada
PM- HCOPL 11 Apr II Emergency Library
P-- HCOPL 11 Apr Goals Finding and Goals Finders
P-- HCOPL 11 Apr Tech Dir's Weekly Report
P-- HCOPL 11 Apr Appointments
P-- HCOPL 11 Apr Memberships
PMC HCOPL 13 Apr Policy of HGCs
OTC HCOB  13 Apr R2G, Original R2, 3GA, 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A and Others
P-- HCOPL 16 Apr HCO Execs Current Lists
>-C$HCOB  17 Apr R3M2 Redo goals found on this pattern
-TC HCOB  18 Apr Routine 3M2, Directive Listing
P-C HCOPL 22 Apr Hat of Course Administrator (canc 16 May 69)
-TC HCOB  23 Apr Routine 3M2, Handling the GPM
-TC HCOB  24 Apr Routine 3M2, Tips, The Rocket Read of a Reliable Item
PM- HCOPL 25 Apr RRev. 29 Aug 90 Duties of a Staff Member
OTC HCOB  25 Apr Meter Reading TRs
-TC HCOB  28 Apr Routine 3, An Actual Line Plot
-TC HCOB  29 Apr Routine 3, Directive Listing, Listing Liabilities
O-C HCOB  29 Apr Modernized Training Drills using Permissive Coaching
PMC HCOPL 30 Apr The Saint Hill Staff Co-audit
-TC HCOB  30 Apr Routine 3
P-- HCOPL  2 May Reiss ser 13 How To Do a Staff Job  (reiss PL 11 Apr 61)
-TC HCOB   4 May Routine 3, An Actual Line Plot No. 2
-TC HCOB   5 May Routine 3, R3 Stable Data
P-- HCOPL  5 May Sec ED; Staff Member Enrollments
-TC HCOB   8 May The Nature of Formation of the GPM
*-- HCOPL  8 May Squirrel Process Investigation
P-- HCOPL  9 May International Council
--- HCOPL  9 May Change in Report Line (canc. per OEC)
--C HCOAL 10 May the pattern for an HCO area secretary
--- HCOPL 10 May Student Rates for HGC Auditing in SA Org (canc per OEC)
--C HCOIL 10 May The E-Meter
--C SECED 10 May Maids HAT
>-C$HCOB  11 May Routine 3 Heaven 
-TC HCOB  12 May Routine 3, RI Form (GPM RI Form Corrected)
-TC HCOB  13 May Routine 3, R3N Directive Listing with New R3 Model Session
--C HCOPL 13 May supplies of books to scientology organizations (canc per OEC)
PM- HCOPL 15 May Instructor Hats
OTC HCOB  15 May The Time Track and Engram Running by Chains, Bulletin 1
-M- SECED 20 May Scientology Missionary Hat
-TC HCOB  20 May Routine 3N, Proper Programing, Fast Blowing RIs
O-C HCOB  21 May R3R Model Session (cancelled - HCOB 19 Nov 63)
PM- HCOPL 24 May Changes in Basement Student Facilities
--- HCOPL 25 May Press Relations (canc 11 Oct 65)
-TC HCOB  26 May Routine 3, Line Plot
OTC HCOB  27 May Cause of ARC Breaks
P-- HCOPL 29 May Reiss Ser 14 How To Handle Work (Reiss of HCOB 19 Aug 59)
P-C HCOPL 31 May Training of Clears 
-T- HCOB   1 Jun Routine 2, New Processes
>-C HCOB   4 Jun checking out the Joburg, tips to sec check instructors (BTB?)
-TC HCOB   4 Jun Routine 3, Handling GPMs
OTC HCOB   8 Jun R 3 Oct 77 The Time Track and Engram Running by Chains, #2
PM- HCOPL 10 Jun Scientology Training, Technical Studies
>-C HCOB  13 Jun New Training Drills
PMC HCOPL 17 Jun Staff Clearing Program
*-- HCOPL 17 Jun Ray Kemp & San Diego
PM- HCOPL 18 Jun Tape Release
*-- HCOPL 18 Jun Suspension of Certs
P-- HCOPL 18 Jun Students Blowing (canc per OEC)
P-- HCOPL 18 Jun Policy Checks (canc per OEC)
PM- HCOPL 24 Jun Review of Departments
OTC HCOB  24 Jun Routine 3, Engram Running by Chains, Bulletin 3
OTC HCOB  25 Jun Routine 2H, ARC Breaks by Assessment
P-- HCOPL 26 Jun Reiss ser 15, Routing of Comm (Reiss of HCOB 25 Feb 58)
--- HCOPL 26 Jun Resume of Franchise Policy
OTC HCOB   1 Jul Routine 3R, Bulletin 4, Preliminary Step
P-- HCOPL  3 Jul Change of Routing Org Tech Reports
P-- HCOPL  5 Jul Sales of Lifetime Memberships or Shares
OTC HCOB   5 Jul ARC Break Assessments
O-- HCOB   5 Jul CCHs Rewritten 
OTC HCOB   9 Jul A Tech Summary, The Required Skills of Processing and Why
P-- HCOPL  9 Jul HPA/HCA Certificate Checksheet
P-- BPL    9 Jul Meter Demonstration Booth Hat r. 5 Aug 75
--C HCOIL  9 Jul A treatise on the E-meter
O-C HCOB  11 Jul Auditing Rundown - Missed Withhold - Top be Run in X1 Unit
-TC$HCOB  14 Jul Routine 3N, Line Plots
>-C HCOB  17 Jul errors in running 3N
P-C HCOPL 19 Jul Reiss ser 16 Admin Stable Data (reiss of SecED 4 May 59)
OTC HCOB  21 Jul Co-audit ARC Break Process
OTC HCOB  22 Jul I You Can Be Right
OTC HCOB  22 Jul III Org Technical, HGC Processes and Training
PM- HCOPL 23 Jul Retreads on Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
P-- HCOPL 23 Jul Appointment (USA)
OTC HCOB  23 Jul Auditing Rundown, Missed Withholds, To Be Run in X1 Unit
>-C$HCOB  24 Jul R3N Corrections
>-C HCOB  26 Jul training technology coaching theory (BTB?)
P-C HCOPL 26 Jul Continental Director Hat Write-up (canc per OEC)
OTC HCOB  28 Jul Time and the Tone Arm
OTC HCOB  29 Jul I Scientology Review
-T- HCOB  29 Jul II R3R-R3N-R3T, Cautionary HCOB 
>-C HCOB  29 Jul SHSBC Training Drills
PMC HCOPL 30 Jul Current Planning
PTC HCOPL  2 Aug I Public Project One
PM- HCOPL  2 Aug II Saint Hill Course Changes
OTC HCOB   4 Aug E-Meter Errors, Communication Cycle Error
P-- HCOPL  8 Aug Plants in Academies - Introduction of Form B (canc per OEC)
OTC HCOB   9 Aug Definition of Release
-M- HCOIL  9 Aug Public Meetings
OTC HCOB  11 Aug ARC Break Assessments
PM- HCOPL 12 Aug Certificates and Awards
OTC HCOB  14 Aug Lecture Graphs
PM- HCOPL 14 Aug Press Policies (reiss as PR Series 31)
P-- HCOPL 16 Aug Indivdual Auditors Operating in a Central Org Control Area
OTC HCOB  19 Aug How to Do an ARC Break Assessment
OTC HCOB  20 Aug R3R-R3N, The Preclear's Postulates
PT- HCOPL 21 Aug Change of Organization Targets, Project 80, A Preview
--C HCOIL 21 Aug Ron's journal no. 6
OTC HCOB  22 Aug Project 80, The Itsa Line and Tone Arm
PM- HCOPL 22 Aug ARC Break Assessments on Staff
-TC$HCOB  24 Aug R3N, The Train GPMs, The Marcab Between Lives Implants
OTC HCOB   1 Sep I Routine Three SC
-T- HCOB   1 Sep II Scientology Two, Routine 1C
-TC HCOIL  1 Sep Scientology One
P-- HCOPL  2 Sep Staff Changes
PM- HCOPL  3 Sep Status of Auckland
>-C HCOB   4 Sep Assessment TRs
OTC HCOB   6 Sep Instructing in Scn Auditing, Instructor's Task,
PM- HCOPL  7 Sep Committees of Evidence, Scn Jurisprudence, Administration Of
OTC HCOB   9 Sep Repetitive Rudiments and Repetitive Prepchecking
P-- HCOPL 10 Sep Reiss 17 The Credo of a Good & Skilled Mgr (HCOB 22 Apr 59)
--C BTB   12 Sep CCH's Data
--C HCOIL 16 Sep new scientology basic definitions
--C HCOPL 18 Sep Scientology Five Scientology Instructors (canc per OEC)
PMC HCOPL 22 Sep Concerning Committees of Evidence
>-C HCOB  22 Sep Scientology Two Prepcheck Buttons
OTC HCOB  23 Sep Tape Coverage of New Technology
P-- HCOPL 24 Sep Urgent Course Rules and Regulations (canc. per OEC)
OTC HCOB  25 Sep Adequate Tone Arm Action
P-C HCOPL 25 Sep Right to Refuse HPA/HCA Student Application
P-- HCOPL 25 Sep Hats of Student Instructors for SHSBC (canc per OEC)
P-C BPL   27 Sep Training Technology Pink Sheets r. 16 Jun 74
-TC HCOB  28 Sep Actual Goals
P-- HCOPL 28 Sep Student ARC Breaks (canc per OEC)
OTC HCOB   1 Oct How to Get Tone Arm Action
>-C HCOB   1 Oct Training Cycles (BTB?)
OTC HCOB   2 Oct GPMs, Experimental Process Withdrawn
P-- HCOPL  3 Oct Appointment
PMC HCOPL  4 Oct Technical Council
PM- HCOPL  7 Oct Fire Security Doors
PMC HCOPL  8 Oct I New Saint Hill Certificates and Course Changes
*-- HCOPL  8 Oct Doctors of Scientology
OTC HCOB   8 Oct How to Get TA, Analyzing Auditing
OTC HCOB  16 Oct R3SC Slow Assessment
-T- HCOB  17 Oct I R-2C Slow Assessment by Dynamics
-T- HCOB  17 Oct II R-2C Slow Asmt. by Dyn. Dir. for Use of HCOB of Oct 17
PMC HCOPL 23 Oct Refund Policy
P-- HCOPL 30 Oct Reiss 18 Concerning City Offices
-TC HCOB  31 Oct R-2C Slow Assessment by Dynamics, Continued
PM- HCOPL  4 Nov Pay Card
PM- HCOPL 11 Nov Committees of Evidence
O-- HCOB  19 Nov R3R Model Session Revised (Cancelled by HCOB 20 Apr 64)
--C TAL   21 Nov data taken from recent LRH lecture
P-- HCOPL 22 Nov Appointment
---$SECED 23 Nov Ron's Instructions [Kennedy ...]
OTC HCOB  25 Nov Dirty Needles
PTC HCOPL 26 Nov Certificate and Classification Changes, Everyone Classified
OTC HCOB  26 Nov A New Triangle, Basic Auditing, Technique, Case Analysis
PMC HCOPL  4 Dec Org Staff W/H Checks
PM- HCOPL  6 Dec Org Programing
-TC HCOIL 10 Dec The Dangerous Environment, The True Story of Scientology
PMC HCOPL 11 Dec Classification for Everyone
PM- HCOPL 13 Dec Co-audit
OTC HCOB  14 Dec Case Analysis, Health Research
--C HCOIL 17 Dec Ron's journal no. 7
PM- HCOPL 27 Dec The "Magic" of Good Management
OTC HCOB  28 Dec Routine 6, Indicators, Part One: Good Indicators
P-- HCOPL 31 Dec SH Re-organization
M-- MESSAGE late Dec Ron's Journal


=================== 1964 =============

: Books and Materials of 1964

: In May, Mr. Hubbard created The Auditor, a new magazine sent out 
: regularly from Saint Hill to swiftly carry information on his latest 
: technical developments as well as news of Saint Hill and the wins 
: of Saint Hill students and preclears.
:
: Technical progress in 1964 included tremendous achievements in the 
: field of education. Combining his own experiences as a student with 
: observations made in training others, Mr. Hubbard developed Scientology 
: study technology and recorded this revolutionary new tech in lectures 
: to students on the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.
: 
: In December of 1964, R6EW and Solo auditing were released at Saint 
: Hill Manor.
: 
: Azimuth Alignment Meter
: The Azimuth Alignment Meter became available in 1964. It was a 
: "see-through" meter -- the dial being glass both front and back.
: This enabled an auditor to look through the dial while writing to 
: ensure that no movement of the needle was missed. It is a Mark V 
: meter in function.


*-- HCOPL  7 Jan Gradient Scale of Personnel Procurement - Confidential
P-- HCOPL  7 Jan Payment of Monies for Overtime and/or Materiel
>-C HCOB   8 Jan Scientology VI routine VI two actual line plots
P-- HCOPL  9 Jan Org Despatch Routing Canada
P-- HCOPL 10 Jan Address Changes for WW
PM- HCOPL 14 Jan I Continental and Area HCO Finance Policies
PM- HCOPL 14 Jan II Future Continental Officer Status
OTC HCOB  21 Jan Meter Level Warning
PMC HCOPL 24 Jan I HCO (Sthil) Ltd., Course Staff Transfers
PM- HCOPL 24 Jan II Scientology Library and Research, Ltd.
O-C HCOPL 24 Jan Case Supervisor 
P-- HCOPL 24 Jan Continental Director Appointment South Africa
PMC HCOPL 25 Jan Department of Enrollment
P-- HCOPL 25 Jan HCO (SH) Ldt Personnel Transfer
PM- HCOPL 26 Jan HCO (WW) Ltd., Central Org Activities
-MC HCOPL 29 Jan HCO (SH) Charts, Routings and Pubs, The Enrollment Dept
*-- HCOPL 30 Jan Comm Ev Findings
PM- HCOPL 31 Jan Corporation Coordinator
PM- HCOPL  3 Feb HCO (Sthil), Ltd., Transport
P-C HCOPL  3 Feb Saint Hill children
PMC HCOPL  5 Feb Founding Scientologist Certificate
--C HCOIL  5 Feb Ron's journal no. 8
--C HCOIL  5 Feb OT course open to all auditors who have good basic training
PMC HCOPL  9 Feb Comm Baskets
PMC HCOPL 10 Feb Enrollment on Self-determinism
--- HCOPL 11 Feb Press Inquires (canc per OEC)
PMC HCOPL 13 Feb Classification
PMC HCOPL 15 Feb The Equipment of Organizations
---$HCOB  19 Feb Scn. V (excerpt of HCOB 28 Sep 63 Actual Goals above)
PMC HCOPL 20 Feb Regulations (Scn Library & Research)
PMC HCOPL 21 Feb I Staff Regulations, Auditing versus Job
P-C HCOPL 21 Feb Dept of Enrollment
>-C HCOB  21 Feb scientology six taught only at Saint Hill
PMC HCOPL 21 Feb III Issuing of Certificates
PMC HCOPL 23 Feb Classification
PM- HCOPL 24 Feb I SLR Ltd., Tape Copying
PMC HCOPL 24 Feb II Org Programing
--C HCOPL 24 Feb rundown of case supervisor hat (canc per OEC)
P-- HCOPL 24 Feb Technical Supervision Changes
P-- HCOPL 24 Feb Nomination of Case Supervisior
OTC HCOB   1 Mar Meter Reads, Size Of
>-C HCOB   1 Mar scientology VI goals recording pain in R6
PMC HCOPL  2 Mar Contracts and Services
O-C HCOB   4 Mar Class II Model Session (cancelled by HCOB 19 May 63)
>-C HCOB   6 Mar goals that begin the series track analysis
--C HCOIL  6 Mar child processing
--C TAL    6 Mar all levels points from LRH lectures to the SH staff co-audit
--C TAL    6 Mar aud. & asmt. basic data from LRH lectures (Feb. 25 & Mar. 3)
PMC HCOPL  7 Mar Director of Enrollment, The Letter Registrar, Administration
-TC HCOB  10 Mar Basic Auditing, Nonreading Meters, Meter Flinch
PMC HCOPL 11 Mar I Auditors Division, New HCO WW Organization
PMC HCOPL 11 Mar II Departmental Changes, Auditors Division
PM- HCOPL 11 Mar III Mission Program (titled Franchise in old OEC)
>-C HCOB  11 Mar scientology VI bad indicators and technical notes
--C HCOIL 13 Mar Ron's journal no. 9
OTC HCOB  15 Mar I Overwhelming the Pc
OTC HCOB  15 Mar II Meter, Everything Reading
--C HCOIL 16 Mar the U.S. saturday evening post article March 14, 1964
>-C HCOB  16 Mar scientology VI goals that begin the series track analysis
>-C HCOB  16 Mar Scientology six- part two track analysis- drills
>-C HCOB  17 Mar track analysis
OTC HCOPL 18 Mar HGC Allowed Processes
P-- HCOPL 18 Mar California Franchise
PM- HCOPL 19 Mar Staff Regulations
>-C HCOB  19 Mar scientology- six.  Part one basic auditing- drills
>-C HCOB  19 Mar scientology VI.  Goal check outs
>-C HCOB  20 Mar scientology VI- part 2 track analysis the GPM
>-C HCOB  20 Mar scientology VI goals that don't exist as actual goals
-T- HCOIL 20 Mar Postulates
P-- HCOPL 20 Mar Urgent - Technical Reports
--- HCOPL 20 Mar District Office and Org Control Area (canc per OEC)
>-C HCOB  21 Mar scientology VI plots
P-- HCOPL 31 Mar Scientology Orgs Comm System Despatches
PMC HCOPL  1 Apr I New Mimeo Line, HCO Executive Letter
PM- HCOPL  1 Apr II Saint Hill Personnel
OTC HCOIL  2 Apr Two Types of People
PMC HCOPL  2 Apr I To the Saint Hill Student: Instruction Targets
PM- HCOPL  2 Apr II SH Enrollment, Materials, Courses & Use of Cl VI Processes
PM- HCOPL  2 Apr III Use of Recreation Facilities, 1964
--C TAL    5 Apr lower levels summary
OTC HCOB   7 Apr Q and A
>-C HCOB   7 Apr scientology VI- part five R6 auditing
>-C HCOB   7 Apr scientology VI- part five
>-C HCOB   7 Apr scientology VI- part six
>-C HCOB   7 Apr Scientology VI- part five gpm auditing
--C TAL    7 Apr truth and reality case progress at levels I-IV
OTC HCOB  10 Apr Auditing Skills
PMC HCOPL 10 Apr I Balancing -- Income Outgo, Paper, Postage and Printing
PMC HCOPL 10 Apr II Scientology Courses
PM- HCOPL 10 Apr III Domestic Staff
OT- HCOB  13 Apr I Tone Arm Action
-T- HCOB  13 Apr II Glossary of Terms
--C TAL   14 Apr intention
--C TAL   15 Apr flattening processes
P-- HCOPL 17 Apr Food & Cleaning Regulations for Students
>-C HCOB  20 Apr model session levels III to VI session preliminaries
--- HCOPL 21 Apr Org Payments for Tape Recorded Lectures (canc per OEC)
P-- HCOPL 22 Apr Summary of Policies on Class, Grades, Certs, ...
>-C HCOB  23 Apr scientology III auditing by lists
OM- Article The AUDITOR 1 The Workability of Scientology
PT- HCOPL  5 May Summary of Classification and Gradation and Certification
PMC HCOPL  6 May I Accounts Policies
P-- HCOPL  6 May Reorganization
P-- HCOPL  7 May Right to Print or Reprint Scientology Books & Materials
PM- HCOPL  8 May Transport
--C TAL    8 May Auditor listening
PMC HCOPL 12 May Theory Testing, Expiration Dates
PM- HCOPL 13 May I Transport
P-- HCOPL 13 May Info About Your Post Reports
P-- HCOPL 14 May Continental Change
P-- HCOPL 15 May Classifications (Level VI Course)
P-- HCOPL 15 May Accounts Policies
O-C HCOB  19 May Class II Model Session
PM- HCOPL 25 May I Instructor's Conference Report Form
PMC HCOPL 25 May II Press Relations
OTC HCOB  27 May Auditing Assignments
PM- HCOPL 28 May Reorganization
>-C HCOB  31 May level VI arc break assessment for routine 6
-MC HCOPL  2 Jun Data for All Staff Members (not listed in old OEC index)
-M- Article The AUDITOR 2 The Gradation Program
--C HCOEL  4 Jun cycles of action
PMC HCOPL  9 Jun Reorganization (St. Hill staff only)
>-C HCOB   9 Jun scientology six level VI progress
PM- HCOPL 11 Jun I Central Organization and City Office Tape Service
PMC HCOPL 11 Jun II New Students Data, Star-rated for New Students
P-- HCOPL 12 Jun HAS & HQS Training Materials
PM- HCOPL 16 Jun Personnel Records, Admin Certs
P-- HCOPL 16 Jun Franchise, What it is & Who May Have It (repl. 2 Jan 65)
PM- HCOPL 18 Jun New Posts
P-- HCOPL 18 Jun Professional Route Class Requirements
P-C HCOPL 22 Jun Reiss ser 19 Organization Posts - two types (HCOB 24 Apr 59)
--C TAL   22 Jun Starting a franchise centere
P-- HCOPL 23 Jun Reiss ser 20 HCO Theory of Communication (PL 2 Mar 59)
PM- HCOPL 25 Jun Departmental Reports
PM- HCOPL 26 Jun Staff Bonuses
--C HCOEL 26 Jun a new pattern of organization
OTC HCOB  29 Jun Central Org and Field Auditor Targets
P-- HCOPL  1 Jul Certification and Classification
PM- HCOPL  2 Jul Bulletin and Policy Letter Distribution
OTC HCOB   7 Jul Justifications
OTC HCOB   8 Jul I More Justifications
-TC HCOB   8 Jul II Good Indicators
OTC HCOB  10 Jul Overts -- Order of Effectiveness in Processing
-T- Article The AUDITOR 3 Ron's Journal No. 10
OTC HCOB  12 Jul More on O/Ws
OTC HCOB  24 Jul TA Counters, Use Of
OTC HCOB  29 Jul Good Indicators at Lower Levels
PMC HCOPL 30 Jul Gradation Program, Revised
-MC HCOEL  6 Aug Accounts Unit
PMC HCOPL 10 Aug Good Workers
PM- HCOPL 12 Aug Policy on Technical Information
OTC HCOB  14 Aug Prepcheck Buttons
O-C HCOB  14 Aug Model Session Levels III to VI
OTC HCOB  17 Aug Clay Table Work in Training and Processing
PM- HCOPL 17 Aug Technical Info for Continental Mags
>-C HCOB  17 Aug R6 co-auditing the processing of end words only
OT- HCOB  18 Aug Clay Table Work, Covering Clay Table Clearing in Detail
PMC HCOPL 21 Aug Staff Auditors (rev 7 Jun 67)
OTC HCOB  23 Aug HQS Course
OTC HCOB  24 Aug Session Must-Nots
PMC HCOPL 26 Aug PE Course
-MC HCOEL  1 Sep Technical Lectures by Other Personnel
*-- HCOPL  4 Sep ? (not to be remimeod per PL 8 Sep 64)
P-- HCOPL  4 Sep Congresses (canc per OEC)
PMC HCOPL  5 Sep Examinations
OTC HCOB   7 Sep I Clay Table Levels
OTC HCOB   7 Sep II PTPs, Overts and ARC Breaks
P-- HCOPL  8 Sep Rush Important Correction (cancels PL of 4 Sep 64)
OTC HCOB   8 Sep Overts, What Lies Behind Them?Word Clearing Series 11
OTC HCOB   9 Sep I Clay Table Healing
OTC HCOB   9 Sep II Clay Table Clearing
PM- HCOPL  9 Sep Purpose of Ad Comm
P-- HCOPL  9 Sep Putting Personnel on the Job (reiss of PL 18 Oct 59)
OTC HCOB  12 Sep Clay Table, More Goofs
PMC HCOPL 16 Sep I Understanding and Tape Lectures
PM- HCOPL 16 Sep II Terminations
P-- HCOPL 18 Sep Final Classif. Termination from SH (canc. by PL 13 Nov 64)
PM- HCOPL 23 Sep Policies: Dissemination and Programs
P-- HCOPL 24 Sep Changes of Addresses to HCO WW Founding Scientologists
OM- HCOPL 24 Sep Instruction and Examination: Raising the Standard Of
OTC HCOB  27 Sep Clay Table Clearing
OMC HCOPL 28 Sep Clay Table Use
PM- HCOPL 30 Sep HCO Corporations
-T- Article The AUDITOR 4 Ron's Journal No. 11
OTC HCOPL  4 Oct Theory Checkout Data (rev 21 May 67)
PMC HCOPL  8 Oct Artistic Presentation Art Series 12
-M- HCOEL 12 Oct Congress Organization and Increasing Interest and Attendance
OTC HCOB  17 Oct I Clay Table Data
OTC HCOB  17 Oct II Getting the Pc Sessionable
OTC HCOB  17 Oct III Clearing, Why It Works, How It Is Necessary
P-- HCOPL 19 Oct Pricing Formulas (canc. by PL 18 Apr 65)
PM- HCOPL 20 Oct Stickers for PABs Wanted
>-C HCOB  22 Oct What an r6 auditor should know
>-C HCOB  22 Oct scientology VI arc break assessment--livingness list L6L
PM- HCOPL 27 Oct R 15 Nov 87 Pol. on Phy. Healing, Insanity and Sources of Trouble
P-- HCOPL 30 Oct Mailing Lists for Franchise Holders (canc. by PL 18 Apr 65)
P-C HCOPL 31 Oct Current Pols. Orgs & Franchise HQS course (canc PL 18 Apr 65)
PMC HCOPL 31 Oct Addressograph Equipment Warning
-T- Article The AUDITOR 5 Gradation Program Reviewed
OTC HCOB   1 Nov More Clay Table Clearing Goofs
>-C HCOB   1 Nov scientology VI provisional cl. auditng requirements
P-C HCOPL  5 Nov Corrections to PLs of 27 & 31 Oct 64
P-- HCOPL  6 Nov Corporate Status
P-- HCOPL  6 Nov Corporate Structure Western Hemisphere
OTC HCOB   6 Nov Styles of Auditing
P-- HCOPL  9 Nov Corrections to PLs of 19 & 31 Oct 64
OTC HCOB  12 Nov Definition Processes (Word Clearing Series 26)
PM- HCOPL 13 Nov Provisional Class VI Classification
PMC HCOPL 15 Nov I Transport Arrangements
PM- HCOPL 15 Nov II Traffic Regulations Saint Hill
OTC HCOB  16 Nov Clay Table Label Goofs
-T- Article CERTAINTY VOL. 11, NO. 11 Nov Socialism and Scientology
PM- HCOPL 17 Nov I Off-Line and Off-Policy, Your Full In-Basket
PM- HCOPL 17 Nov II Bonus
P-- HCOPL 20 Nov Correction to PL of 17 Nov 64
P-- HCOPL 21 Nov Discounts Central Orgs Books
P-- HCOPL 26 Nov Pricing Formulas
PMC HCOPL 30 Nov RB Rev. 2 Feb 91 HCO Book Account
P-- HCOPL  3 Dec Pricing Meetings Final Policy (canc. PL 18 Apr 65)
-M- HCOPL  3 Dec R 7 Jul 83 Booming an Org Through Training (not in old OEC)

:  R6EW Materials - The materials for this Solo-audited level were 
:  released 8 December 1964.

>-C$HCOB   8 Dec scientology VI solo auditing and R6 EW solo auditing
OTC HCOB  10 Dec Listen-style Auditing
OTC HCOB  11 Dec I Curriculum for Level 0 HAS
OTC HCOB  11 Dec II Scientology 0 Processes

: The Scientology Pin(or Membership Pin)
: Worn by members of the Hubbard Association of Scientologists International, 
: a gold lapel-sized pin of the Scientology symbol.
:
: Following the release of the Classification, Gradation and Awareness 
: Chart of Levels and Certificates in 1965, a series of insignia 
: became available that could be worn to show an individual's training 
: level and grade of release. 
: 
: Auditor Blazer Badge for Class IV Auditor
: This is a shield with two horizontal stripes across the top. The 
: top stripe is yellow with the Roman numerals "0-IV" in red. The 
: second stripe is black with the word "auditor" in gold. The bottom 
: of the shield is green with a gold Scientology symbol. Below the 
: shield is a gold banner with the words "Standard Tech" in red. 


PM- HCOPL 11 Dec Full Table of Courses and Classification, Classification Correction
P-- HCOPL 12 Dec Correction to PL 6 Nov 64 Corp. Structure W.Hem.
PM- HCOPL 17 Dec Tape Prices
PM- HCOPL 18 Dec I Saint Hill Org Board
P-- HCOPL 18 Dec Staff Appointments
P-- HCOPL 18 Dec Reiss 21 Administrative Traffic Trend (PL 30 Jun 60)
PM- HCOPL 18 Dec IV Re: OIC Data
PM- HCOPL 21 Dec Address Lists to City Offices
P-- HCOPL 23 Dec Field & Public Programming (canc. PL 18 Apr 65)
OTC HCOB  26 Dec Routine 0A (Expanded)
--C BTB   28 Dec E-meter electrodes: a dissertation on soup cans 
P-- HCOPL 30 Dec Arrangements During Absence of Exec Dir & Org Sec
P-- HCOPL 31 Dec Tape Availability
PM- HCOPL 31 Dec I Certificates
PMC HCOPL 31 Dec III Use of "Dianetics," "Scientology," "Applied Philosophy"
>-C HCOB  31 Dec scientology VI arc break assessment ---session list l6s

=================== 1965 ===================

: Books and Materials of 1965

: Great advances were made in Scientology technical and administrative 
: technology in 1965.
: 
: Mr. Hubbard codified the organizational technology he had developed 
: in building Saint Hill into a big, rapidly expanding organization and 
: released it in a flood of new HCO Policy Letters. In fact, 1965 was 
: one of the richest years in Scientology history in terms of policy 
: advances and releases.
: 
: 1965 was also marked by spectacular progress in auditing and training 
: technology. The route to total freedom was fully codified, and the 
: first Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart of Levels and 
: Certificates was released in May. Power Processing was also begun in 
: May, and in September, the Clearing Course was made available to 
: students who had completed the prerequisite auditing steps. 

OT- ARTICLE My Philosophy
-T- Article The AUDITOR 6 Healthy Babies
P-- HCOPL  1 Jan Franchise Application & Agreement
P-C HCOPL  2 Jan Franchise, who May Have It, How To Maintain It
>--$HCOB   4 Jan R6 EW, R6 EWS, R6 EWP CORRECTION
PM- HCOPL 18 Jan Financial Management, Building Fund Account
P-C HCOPL 19 Jan Finance Org Accts, Building Fund Acct (canc. 26 Apr 65)
P-- HCOPL 20 Jan Finance Currency Regulations and 10%
PMC HCOPL 21 Jan R 5 Apr 65 Vital Data on Promo., The Fundamentals of Promo.
P-- HCOPL 21 Jan Addressograph Equipment
-NC HCOB  25 Jan Definition of "Terminal"
PM- HCOPL 28 Jan How to Maintain Credit Standing and Solvency
PM- HCOPL 31 Jan Dev-t
OTC HCOPL  7 Feb Keeping Scientology Working r. 15 Jun 70 & 28 Jan 73
PMC HCOPL  8 Feb Dev-t Analysis
PMC HCOPL 10 Feb Ad and Book Policies
PM- HCOPL 13 Feb I1 965 Saint Hill Objectives
PMC HCOPL 13 Feb II Politics
OTC HCOPL 14 Feb Safeguarding Technology (KSW Series 4) r. 7 Jun 67
PM- HCOPL 20 Feb Appointments and Programs
PMC HCOPL 22 Feb I Inspections
PM- HCOPL 22 Feb II HCO Area Secretary Saint Hill
PM- HCOPL 22 Feb III Executive Director Comm Lines (includes SO 1)
PMC HCOPL 24 Feb Add. to HCOPL of 7 Sep 63, Comm. of Evidence, Scn Jurisprudence
PM- HCOPL 27 Feb Course Pattern
PMC HCOPL 28 Feb I Deliver
PMC HCOPL 28 Feb II Course Checkouts, Twin Checking
PM- HCOPL  1 Mar General Amnesty
P-- HCOPL  1 Mar The Fair Game Law (repl. by PL 23 Dec 65 & BPL 16 Aug 75)
PMC HCOPL  2 Mar Purchase Order Filing
-M- HCOEL  3 Mar II What's Coming Next
PMC HCOPL  4 Mar I Reserved Payment Account
PM- HCOPL  4 Mar RA II Rev. 7 Jul 83 Technical and Policy Distribution
PM- HCOPL  4 Mar III HCO Secretary WW (Hat)
>-C HCOB   4 Mar level 0 materials (BTB?)
>-C HCOB   4 Mar scientology VI gradient scale for solo
PMC HCOPL  5 Mar I New Status of Honorary Awards
PMC HCOPL  5 Mar II Policy: Source Of
OTC HCOB   5 Mar II Book of Case Remedies, Application of Tech
--C HCOEL  5 Mar building fund account
PMC HCOPL  6 Mar Amnesty Policy
PMC HCOPL  7 Mar RA III Rev. 10 Jan 91 Offenses and Penalties
PMC HCOPL  7 Mar II Certificate Cancellation
--C HCOEL  7 Mar current plans
-MC HCOPL  8 Mar Board Decisions, Data Eval. Raw Data, Judging ...
*-- HCOPL  9 Mar Purpose of SO 1 line
OTC HCOB  10 Mar Words, Misunderstood Goofs (Word Clearing Series 14)
PMC HCOPL 13 Mar I The Comm-Member System
PM- HCOPL 13 Mar II The Comm-Member System, Routing Policies Section
PM- HCOPL 13 Mar III The Structure of Organization, What Is Policy?
-M- SECED 13 Mar Registrar Success
PMC HCOPL 15 Mar I Registrars, CF and Address
P-- HCOPL 15 Mar Only Accounts Talks Money (rev 15 Sep 65)
P-C BPL   16 Mar Further Material On Study - Examinations r. 12 Aug 75
PMC HCOPL 17 Mar I Clearing and Training
PMC HCOPL 17 Mar II Rights of a Staff Member, Students and PCs to Justice
PMC HCOPL 17 Mar III Administering Justice
PMC HCOPL 17 Mar IV Organizational Suppressive Acts (fair game law)
P-- HCOPL 17 Mar Faculty Meeting Report
-MC HCOEL 18 Mar Justice
-MC HCOEL 21 Mar PE Comes After They Have Read a Book
PMC HCOPL 21 Mar Staff Members Auditing Outside Pcs
PM- HCOPL 22 Mar Current Promotion and Org Prg. Summary, Membership Rundown
P-C HCOPL 22 Mar SH Services Prices & Discounts (canc. PL 18 Apr 65)
P-C HCOPL 26 Mar Dept 15 Field Auditors (canc 9 May 65)
PMC HCOPL 26 Mar R 8 Nov 84 Field Staff Member I/C Hat, FSMs
-M- HCOEL 27 Mar Confused Presentation Denies Service
PMC HCOPL 27 Mar The Justice of Scientology, Its Use and Purpose ...
PMC HCOPL 28 Mar Emergencies and Accounts Personnel
PMC HCOPL 29 Mar I Routing Despatches
PMC HCOPL 29 Mar II Flows and Expansion, The Fast Flow System
PM- HCOPL 29 Mar III Staff Regulations (Staff Hats)
OTC HCOB  29 Mar ARC Breaks
P-- HCOPL 30 Mar Field Auditors Become Staff (replaced by PL 9 May 65)
PMC HCOPL 31 Mar Justice Policy Letters Corrections
PMC HCOPL  1 Apr HCO Comm. HAS Program Checking Hat LRH Comm N/W Series 21
PMC HCOPL  2 Apr I False Reports
PMC HCOPL  2 Apr II Meter Checks
PMC HCOPL  2 Apr III Heed Heavy Traffic Warnings
PMC HCOPL  2 Apr IV Star-rate Checkouts for Process
PMC HCOPL  2 Apr R V Rev. 14 Dec 80 Administration Outside Scientology
OTC HCOB   2 Apr The Road to Clear
-MC HCOPL  3 Apr Organization of a Scientology Org
OTC HCOB   4 Apr ARC Breaks and Missed Withholds
OTC HCOB   5 Apr A Conditions Test, Process I-X Registrars
PMC HCOPL  5 Apr I Handling the Suppressive Person, The Basis of Insanity
PMC HCOPL  5 Apr II The No-Gain-Case Student
PMC HCOPL  5 Apr III Scientology Makes a Safe Environment
PMC HCOPL  5 Apr IV Legal and Promotion
P-- HCOPL  5 Apr Vital Data On Promotion (rev. of PL 21 Jan 65)
-M- SECED  5 Apr Registrar, Your Orders
PM- HCOPL  6 Apr Letter Reg Hat
PMC HCOPL  7 Apr I Book Auditor
PMC HCOPL  7 Apr II Healing Policy in Field
PMC HCOPL  7 Apr III Amnesty, Cancelled Certs, Justice Comments
PMC HCOPL  7 Apr RA IV Rev. 23 Sep 89 Book Income
--C HCOEL  7 Apr Ron's journal no. 11
OTC HCOB   7 Apr Premature Acknowledgments
PMC HCOPL  8 Apr I Justice Codes-HCO, Org Exec and Div. Secretaries ...
PMC HCOPL  8 Apr R 7 Jul 83 Cancellation of Mail Lists to Field Auditors
PMC HCOPL  9 Apr Correction to Policy Letters on Certification and Awards
PMC HCOPL 10 Apr Dismissals, Transfers and Demotions
PM- HCOPL 12 Apr I Justice
PM- HCOPL 12 Apr II Classification Pass Marks
P-- HCOPL 12 Apr Scientology Pins (canc. by PL 17 Jun 65)
P-- HCOPL 13 Apr Course R6 Auditing (canc by PL 28 Jul 65)
PM- HCOPL 14 Apr I Organization GPM Unit (corrected 23 Apr 65)
PM- HCOPL 14 Apr II Classification on GPMs
PM- HCOPL 14 Apr III Field Auditor Rates
P-- HCOPL 14 Apr "To LRH Daily Reports" (corr 12 Jul 65, canc. 4 Sep 65)
>-C HCOB  14 Apr scientology (gpms) materials of the gpm unit reorganized
PMC HCOPL 16 Apr I The "Hidden Data Line"KSW Series 22
PMC HCOPL 16 Apr II Drills, Allowed
PM- HCOPL 16 Apr III Handling the Public Individual r. 13 Oct 70 r. 15 Dec 72
PMC HCOPL 17 Apr Additional Mag Policy
PMC HCOPL 18 Apr I Contests and Prizes
PM- HCOPL 18 Apr II Prices Lowered Because of New Organization Streamline
OTC HCOB  18 Apr How to Apply Level Processing
PMC HCOPL 19 Apr Training and Proc. Regulations, ... Students' Questions
PM- HCOPL 21 Apr I Basic Certificates, Uncertified Personnel
PM- HCOPL 21 Apr II Membership Attestations
PMC HCOPL 22 Apr II Level 0 Comm Course
PMC HCOPL 22 Apr III Booklets, Handouts, Mailing Pieces
P-- HCOPL 22 Apr Ethics corr. to all Justice PLs (chg. Justice to Ethics)
PM- HCOPL 23 Apr I Clarification, Auditing of Org Executives
P-- HCOPL 23 Apr corr. to PL 8 Apr 65 - canc of mail lists to field aud.
PMC HCOPL 23 Apr III Problems
P-- HCOPL 23 Apr GPM unit (corr to PL 14 Apr 65)
PMC HCOPL 24 Apr Review
PM- HCOPL 26 Apr Sec ED Issues NO. 5
P-- HCOPL 26 Apr cancels PL 19 Jan 65 Finance org accts
OTC HCOB  27 Apr Clay Table Healing Goof
P-- HCOPL 27 Apr HASI Ltd Shares
PMC HCOPL 27 Apr II Price Engram
PMC HCOPL 27 Apr III Book Promotion Design
--C HCOEL 27 Apr Ron's journal no. 12
PM- HCOPL 28 Apr I Color Flash System
PMC HCOPL 28 Apr II Technical Personnel
PMC HCOPL 28 Apr III Power Processes
PMC HCOPL 29 Apr I Bonuses
PMC HCOPL 29 Apr II Petition
PM- HCOPL 29 Apr III Ethics, Review
P-- HCOPL 29 Apr Mimeo Distribution Changes SecEd Distribution
PMC HCOPL 30 Apr Emergency, State Of
PMC HCOPL  1 May I Staff Member Reports
PMC HCOPL  1 May II Order Board and Time Machine
PMC HCOPL  1 May R 29 Aug 90 Organization, the Design of the Organization
P-C HCOPL  4 May Release Award (canc. 23 May 70)
OTC HCOB   5 May Application, More on the Application of Scn to Children
OTC HCOPL  5 May I Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart r. 4 Jul 70
PMC HCOPL  5 May II Supervisors
P-- HCOPL  5 May Grounds (SH)
-M- SECED  5 May "Free Memberships for Six Months..."
-T- CHART Class., Gradation and Awareness Chart of Levels and Certificates
PMC HCOPL  7 May Canc., Mimeo Distribution Changes (Sec ED Distribution)
PM- HCOPL  8 May I Cancellation of Assorted Directives
PM- HCOPL  8 May II Results of HCO Technical Investigation
PM- HCOPL  8 May III Flash Colors and Designations
PMC HCOPL  9 May R 8 Nov 84 Field Auditors Become Staff (FSM Series 1)
PMC HCOPL  9 May II Auditing Fees, Pref. Treatment of Pcs, Scale of Preference
--C HCOEL  9 May Ron's journal no. 13

:  Power Processing Materials
:  The issues covering this new level were released on 10 May 1965 to the 
:  auditors LRH was personally training to deliver it.

-M- SECED 10 May Get Your Tech Division In, Fully Manned and Functioning!
OTC HCOPL 10 May Releases, Vital Data r. 19 Sep 67
PMC HCOPL 11 May I Ethics Officer Hat
PMC HCOPL 11 May R 7 Jul 83 HCO Book Acct PL, Receipt and Use of Membership Monies
>--$HCOB  11 May Scientology VII The Power Processes
PM- HCOPL 13 May I Sale of Bulletins and Tapes Forbidden
PMC HCOPL 13 May II SHSBC Unit Graduation
>--$HCOB  13 May LIST 6 EW
PMC HCOPL 16 May I Important Explanation, Auditing Restrictions
PMC HCOPL 16 May II Indicators of Orgs
PMC HCOPL 16 May III Hubbard Recognized Scientologist
-M- SECED 17 May Clarification of Sec ED 27
OTC HCOPL 17 May I CCHs
PMC HCOPL 17 May II Academy Processing
PMC HCOPL 17 May III Free Scientology Center
P-- HCOPL 18 May Canadian Mailings From Toronto Only
OMC HCOPL 20 May Power Processes
PM- HCOPL 21 May Memorandum of Agreement (corrected 5 Jul 65)
>-C HCOB  22 May scientology III auditing by lists
PMC HCOPL 23 May II Rebates
P-- HCOPL 24 May Student's Guide To Acceptible Behavior
-M- SECED 24 May Examinations
-M- SECED 26 May Re: Sec ED 29 (Tech Div)
PMC HCOPL 26 May I Petitions

: Auditor Blazer Badge for Class VI Auditor
: This is a shield with two horizontal stripes across the top. The 
: top stripe is yellow with the Roman numeral "VI" in red. The 
: second stripe is black with the word "auditor" in gold. The bottom 
: of the shield is blue with a gold Scientology symbol. Below the shield 
: is a gold banner with the words "Standard Tech" in red.
: 
: The Power Release Pin
: For the preclear who has attained Grades V, VA or VI, a release pin 
: with the S and double triangle (Scientology symbol) with the red R 
: encircled by a gold wreath. 
: 
: The Release Pin
: A small lapel-sized pin. It is the Scientology symbol in gold with a 
: red R (for Release) mounted on it. It signifies a release, Grades 0 
: through IV.

PMC HCOPL 26 May II Communications, Registered Mail
PMC HCOPL 26 May III Courts of Ethics
PTC HCOPL 27 May Processing KSW Series 31
PMC HCOPL 28 May I Some Allowed Ads, Book Ads
PM- HCOPL 28 May II Mission Courses (orig title Franchise Courses)
PM- HCOPL 31 May I Noise, Session Interruption
PM- HCOPL 31 May II Mission Summary of Policy (Franchise summary of policy) 
--C HCOEL  1 Jun TR goofs
PMC HCOPL  2 Jun I Writing of an Ethics Order
-M- HCOPL  2 Jun II Org Ethics and Tech
OMC HCOPL  3 Jun R6EW
O-- HCOB   4 Jun Class II Model Session (canc. by HCOB 3 Jul 60)
-M- SECED  4 Jun "All Pcs Undergoing Power Processing..."
PMC HCOPL  7 Jun I New Org Board Design
PM- HCOPL  7 Jun II Entheta Letters and the Dead File, Handling Of
-M- SECED 10 Jun PE and Lectures
PMC HCOPL 11 Jun I The Foundation
PM- HCOPL 11 Jun II Corr to HCOPL 26 May 65 Communications, Registered Mail
--C HCOEL 11 Jun Ron's journal no. 14
PM- HCOPL 12 Jun The Foundation, Forming the Foundation
PM- HCOPL 14 Jun I Folders, Marking Of
PMC HCOPL 14 Jun II Six Power Processes
-M- HCOPL 14 Jun III Politics, Freedom From (in old OEC as 10 Jan 68)
OTC HCOB  14 Jun II Summary Report
OTC HCOPL 17 Jun I Staff Auditor Advices
PM- HCOPL 17 Jun II Scientology Pins (canc. 12 Apr 65)
PM- HCOPL 18 Jun I Grounds Regulations, Staff and Students
PMC HCOPL 18 Jun II Areas of Operation
OTC HCOB  18 Jun Clear and OT Behavior
--C HCOEL 19 Jun how SH went from fin. crisis to affluence in 13 1/2 months
PM- HCOPL 21 Jun I Orgs Are Saint Hill FSMs
PMC HCOPL 21 Jun II Distribution Division (Div 6)
OT- HCOPL 26 Jun HGC Pc Review Auditing Form
OTC HCOB  28 Jun Releases, Different Kinds
--C HCOEL 28 Jul Ron's journal no. 15
OTC HCOB  30 Jun Release, Rehab of Former Releases and Thetan Exteriors
PM- HCOPL 30 Jun Ad
-M- Article The AUDITOR 9 Org Staffs to Release
PMC HCOPL  1 Jul I Ethics Chits
OTC HCOPL  1 Jul II Comm Cycle Additives
PMC HCOPL  1 Jul III Hats, the Reason For
PMC HCOPL  1 Jul IV Letter Reg, Body Reg
PMC HCOPL  3 Jul The Foundation Data
O-C HCOB   3 Jul Model Session Revised
PMC HCOPL  4 Jul Pc Routing, Review Code
P-- HCOPL  5 Jul Memorandum of Agreement (corr to 21 May 65)
P-- HCOPL  5 Jul Assignment of Tech Personnel (can. 11 Jul 65)
PMC HCOPL  6 Jul Releases
PMC HCOPL  7 Jul Photos, News and Statistics for Mags and Auditor
P-- HCOPL  7 Jul Releases, Policy on
--C HCOEL  8 Jul Issue II muzzled auditing
PMC HCOPL  9 Jul Qual Goofs
PMC HCOPL 10 Jul Lines and Terminals Routing
PM- HCOPL 11 Jul Assignment of Tech Personnel (replaces 5 Jul 65)
P-- HCOPL 12 Jul LRH Daily Reports (corr. to 14 Apr 65)
PMC HCOPL 12 Jul I Release Policies, Starting the Pc
OTC HCOB  12 Jul States of Being Attained by Processing
-M- HCOAL 13 Jul Congresses
P-C HCOPL 13 Jul Testing
--C HCOIL 13 Jul Issue III former release queries
--C HCOEL 13 Jul HCO Exec Sec Hat
PM- HCOPL 16 Jul Continental Magazines to Model After Certainty
PMC HCOPL 19 Jul Policy, How to Handle People Who Quote Policy to ...
PMC HCOPL 19 Jul II Separation Order
PTC HCOPL 19 Jul III Release Checks, Procedure For
PM- HCOPL 19 Jul RA IV Rev. 7 Jul 83 Discounts, Central Orgs, Books
OTC HCOB  21 Jul Release Rehabilitation
P-- HCOPL 22 Jul Home Addresses
PM- HCOPL 22 Jul II Dissemination Materials to Saint Hill
PM- HCOPL 23 Jul Priority of Power Processing
PMC HCOPL 26 Jul Release Declaration Restrictions, Healing Amendments
O-- HCOB  27 Jul Auditing by Lists
PM- HCOPL 28 Jul I Handling of Photographs
PM- HCOPL 28 Jul II Case Supervisor, Special Attention
*-- HCOPL 28 Jul Course R6 Auditing (cancels PL 13 Apr 65)
PM- HCOPL 30 Jul Preclear Routing to Ethics
PMC HCOPL 31 Jul Purposes of the Qualifications Division KSW Series 12
>-C HCOB  31 Jul releases r6 ew note
--C HCOEL  1 Aug personnel wanted
PMC HCOPL  2 Aug I Executive Division
PMC HCOPL  2 Aug II Chaplain
OTC HCOB   2 Aug Release Goofs
OTC HCOB   3 Aug Auditing Goofs, Blowdown Interruption
PMC HCOPL  5 Aug Release Checkouts
OTC HCOB   5 Aug Release Stages
OT- HCOB   6 Aug Qualifications Technical Actions
PM- HCOPL  6 Aug Technical Queries from R6 Graduates
PMC HCOPL  7 Aug I Suppressive Persons, Main Characteristics Of
PMC HCOPL  7 Aug II Floating Needle on Former Releases
PMC HCOPL  9 Aug Release Checkouts
PMC HCOPL 12 Aug Council and Ad Comms
PMC HCOPL 13 Aug Foundation, Basic Course Organization
PMC HCOPL 15 Aug Things That Shouldn't Be
PM- HCOPL 16 Aug I Foundation, Basic Course Organization, Correction
PM- HCOPL 16 Aug II Collection from SPs and PTSes
-M- SECED 16 Aug Foundation
PM- HCOPL 17 Aug I Return Address
PM- HCOPL 17 Aug II Certification of Franchise (Mission) Students
O-C HCOB  19 Aug Model Session Revised
PM- HCOPL 20 Aug I General Amnesty
PM- HCOPL 20 Aug II Continuing Pc to Third Stage Release
PMC HCOPL 20 Aug III Appointment of Xerox Officer
PM- HCOPL 20 Aug IV Scientology Org Uniforms, Saint Hill
OTC HCOB  23 Aug Abbreviations and Symbols of Dianetics and Scientology
PTC HCOPL 23 Aug I Classification at Upper Levels, Temporary Measure
PM- HCOPL 23 Aug II Crediting of Auditor in Release Logbook
PT- HCOPL 23 Aug III Deletion of TR 5
PM- HCOPL 24 Aug I Pcs Released Routing
PMC HCOPL 24 Aug II Cleanliness of Quarters and Staff, Improve Our Image
PMC HCOPL 26 Aug RB Rev. 10 Jan 91 Ethics E-Meter Check
P-C HCOPL 26 Aug Scn training Twin Checkouts (excerpts from earlier PLs)
PMC HCOPL 27 Aug Housing-Staff, Students, Preclears
P-- HCOPL 27 Aug Dissem Sec Hat
OT- HCOB  30 Aug R I Rev. 30 Dec 79 Art Art Series 1
OTC HCOB  30 Aug II Release Stages
PMC HCOPL 31 Aug Mail Opening (ammended by BPL 29 Apr 75)
OT- Article The Aims of Scientology
PM- HCOPL  1 Sep II Publications
PMC HCOPL  1 Sep R III Rev. 7 Jul 83 Mailing List Policies
PM- HCOPL  1 Sep IV Some Tech Div Policies
PM- HCOPL  1 Sep R V Rev. 27 Mar 78 Membership Policies
PM- HCOPL  1 Sep VI Saint Hill Services and Prices
PMC HCOPL  1 Sep VII Ethics Protection
P-- HCOPL  1 Sep Current Policy Franchise
PMC HCOPL  4 Sep I Inspection Officer
P-- HCOPL  4 Sep LRH Daily Reports
-M- HCOEL  6 Sep Upping Beginning Scientology Enrollments
PMC HCOPL  8 Sep Supply Officer
-M- SECED  8 Sep Distribution Division Info Packet
-M- SECED  8 Sep Registration Packet
PMC HCOPL  9 Sep Flowers, Care Of
P-- BPL   10 Sep The Franchise Award of Merit r. 1 Jul 75
PMC HCOPL 12 Sep I Foundation Course Change
PM- HCOPL 12 Sep R 4 Feb 91 E-Meters and Books for Academy Students
OTC HCOB  13 Sep R 16 Feb 81 Out-Tech and How to Get It In KSW Series 26
PMC HCOPL 13 Sep II Issue Authority Required for Mimeo
PM- HCOPL 13 Sep III Foundation Course Hours
PMC HCOPL 14 Sep I Classification Is Required Before Moving to Next Level
PM- HCOPL 14 Sep II Units and Bonuses for Org Exec Secs and HCO Exec Secs
PM- HCOPL 14 Sep III New Car Park
P-C HCOPL 14 Sep Only Accounts Talks Money (rev. of 15 Mar 65)
PM- HCOPL 16 Sep I Weekly Secretarial Personnel Report
PMC HCOPL 16 Sep II Foundation
PM- HCOPL 17 Sep Executive Letter Unit
P-- HCOPL 20 Sep Power Processing For The Public (replaced by PL 30 Nov 65)
PMC HCOPL 21 Sep I Cleanliness and Tidiness of Premises
PM- HCOPL 21 Sep II Auditor Estimation Test
PM- HCOPL 21 Sep III Corporate Names, Group Names
OMC HCOPL 21 Sep V E-Meter Drills
PMC$HCOPL 21 Sep VI Purposes of the Department of Registration
P-- HCOPL 21 Sep Memorandum of Agreement (rev. of PL 21 May 65)
OTC HCOB  21 Sep Out-Tech
O-- HCOB  21 Sep Qual Tech Actions correction to HCOB 6 Aug 65
OTC HCOB  22 Sep Release Gradation, New Levels of Release
PM- HCOPL 22 Sep Keys
PM- HCOPL 23 Sep Keeping Stocks Up
PM- HCOPL 24 Sep I Free Release Check
P-- HCOPL 24 Sep Student & PC Reports
PM- HCOPL 24 Sep III Ads and Info Packets
PM- HCOPL 25 Sep Entheta Letters and the Dead File, Handling Of
--C HCOEL 26 Sep Ron's journal no. 16
OTC HCOB  27 Sep Release Gradation, Additional Data
P-- HCOPL 27 Sep Changes of Address for WW

:  Clearing Course Materials 
:  The written materials for the Clearing Course were first presented 
:  to students at its opening on 27 September 1965.

OTC HCOB  29 Sep I Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Process Conclusions
OTC HCOB  29 Sep II The Continuing Overt Act
PMC HCOPL 30 Sep Statistics for Divisions
-T- Article The AUDITOR 10 The States of Existence
-T- Article The AUDITOR 10 Preclears Should Demand Proper E-Meters Be Used
OTC HCOB   1 Oct RRev. 24 Feb 75 Mutter TR
*-C HCOPL  4 Oct Clearing Course Materials 
O-- (HCOPL 11 Aug 71 "Security of data" is excerpted from the above)
PM- HCOPL  5 Oct Routing, Ad Comm Reports and Minutes
--C HCOEL 6 Oct the Melbourne inquiry I
--C HCOEL 8 Oct the Melbourne inquiry
-M- HCOEL 10 Oct Government Conflicts (might be same as below?)
--C HCOEL 10 Oct Ron's journal no. 17
P-- HCOPL 11 Oct Press Relations (rev PL 25 May 63)
P-- HCOPL 11 Oct OIC Cable Change
PMC HCOPL 12 Oct Advisory Committees
PMC HCOPL 13 Oct Dev-t Data, Executive Responsibility
PMC HCOPL 14 Oct I Potential Trouble Source Routing
P-C HCOPL 14 Oct College of Scientology (St. Hill)
P-- HCOPL 14 Oct Course Pattern
PMC HCOPL 15 Oct Rev. 8 Nov 84 FSM Selection Papers and Commissions FSM Ser 3
-M- HCOEL 15 Oct Field Staff Member Commissions
-M- SECED 18 Oct Field Staff Member Program
--C HCOEL 18 Oct single source of blows and lost people, clay table use ...
PMC HCOPL 19 Oct Release Declarations
PMC HCOPL 21 Oct II Bills Payments
P-- HCOPL 21 Oct Release Checks for Franchise PCs
>-C HCOB  21 Oct release rehabilitation
-M- SECED 22 Oct FSM Selection Slips
PMC HCOPL 23 Oct Dissemination Drill
PMC HCOPL 25 Oct Saint Hill Solo Audit Course
PM- HCOPL 26 Oct Low Statistics
PMC HCOPL 27 Oct Grade Award Insignia
--C HCOIL 27 Oct Lecture of Oct. 14, 1965
PM- HCOPL 28 Oct Discounts
PM- HCOPL 29 Oct I Student Auditing of Preclears
PMC HCOPL 29 Oct II Ethics Authority Section, Office of LRH 
-M- SECED  2 Nov In HCO Policy Letter..."
-MC HCOEL  2 Nov Your Org-Reply Expected
P-- HCOPL  2 Nov FSMs for St. Hill
PM- HCOPL  2 Nov II Foundation Central Files Officer and Address In-Charge
PM- HCOPL  2 Nov III Fast Line Sec EDs and Admin Orders
-M- HCOPL  2 Nov IV Org Division, Income Dept
PMC HCOPL  3 Nov I Equipment
PMC HCOPL  3 Nov II Pc Scheduling
-M- ADMIN DIRECTIVE 4 Nov Appearances Officer Hat Write-up
-M- HCOEL  4 Nov "I Am Worried about Your Foundation..."
OTC HCOB   5 Nov Five-Way Bracket on Help
O-- HCOB   5 Nov Lecture Graphs (duplicates HCOB 14 Aug 63)
OTC HCOB   7 Nov Release Rehabilitation Error
PMC HCOPL  7 Nov I Reception Log, In-the-Org List
PM- HCOPL  7 Nov II Autographed Copies of Books by LRH
OTC HCOB   8 Nov Suppressives and Hidden Standards
PMC HCOPL 10 Nov The Cramming Section
PM- HCOPL 12 Nov II Paint, Odorless
PM- BPL   12 Nov III Transfers from SHSBC to Solo Audit Course r. 13 Jul 75
PM- HCOPL 13 Nov Release Pins
OTC HCOB  14 Nov Clearing Commands
PMC HCOPL 15 Nov Reporting of Theft and Action to Be Taken
OT- HCOB  16 Nov R I Rev. 22 Feb 79 E-Meter Sensitivity Setting
OT- HCOB  16 Nov II Commands for Upper Indoctrination TR 6, TR 7, TR 9
PMC HCOPL 17 Nov The Basic Principles of Promotion
-M- SECED 18 Nov Field Staff Member Courses
PMC HCOPL 18 Nov I Appointment of Personnel
OTC HCOB  19 Nov Problems Process
OTC HCOPL 19 Nov Auditing Reports
PMC HCOPL 20 Nov R 4 May 85 The Promotional Actions of an Organization
PMC HCOPL 20 Nov II Org Rudiments Section
PMC HCOPL 21 Nov Check Signing (corr. 31 Dec 65)
-M- SECED 23 Nov Organization at Saint Hill
P-- HCOPL 23 Nov Mark V & Azimuth E-Meters
OTC HCOB  24 Nov Search and Discovery
PMC HCOPL 26 Nov Rev. 31 Oct 82 Financial Planning Finance Series 40
-M- SECED 26 Nov Income Data
OTC HCOB  26 Nov Information on Rehabilitation
-T- HCOB  30 Nov Library Record of Levels
PM- HCOPL 30 Nov Power Processing for the Public (replaces 20 Sep 65)
OTC HCOB   1 Dec CCHs
OTC HCOB   6 Dec Low TA Cases
PM- HCOPL  7 Dec Tape Color Flash Code
P-C HCOPL  8 Dec Distribute - To spread out so as to cover something
PM- HCOPL  9 Dec Rev. 7 Jul 83 HCO Income, Memberships-Tape Plays
OTC HCOB  10 Dec E-Meter Drill Coaching
PM- HCOPL 13 Dec Numbering of Certificates
P-- HCOPL 13 Dec Staff on SH Clearing Course
-M- SECED 14 Dec Departmental Actions
PMC HCOPL 15 Dec R I Rev. 25 Jul 87 Student's Guide to Acceptable Behavior
P-- HCOPL 15 Dec Additions to Gros Statistics for Divisions (30 Sep 65)
P-- HCOPL 15 Dec Additions to PL 20 Nov 65 Promo Actions of an Org
PM- HCOPL 15 Dec II Gifts
PMC HCOPL 15 Dec III Ethics Chits
-M- SECED 16 Dec Registration and Service
PM- HCOPL 16 Dec I Copyright: USA
PMC HCOPL 16 Dec II Statistics of the International Executive Division
-M- SECED 21 Dec Accounts Clearance
P-C HCOPL 21 Dec lrh financial relationship to orgs
PMC HCOPL 23 Dec RB Rev. 8 Jan 91 Suppressive Acts
---(orig title: Ethics Suppressive Acts The Fair Game Law)
OTC HCOB  27 Dec Vitamins
PMC HCOPL 27 Dec RA Rev. 7 May 84 LRH Communicator LRH Comm N/W Series 2

:  The Clear and OT Bracelets
:  A Clear is signified by a silver identification bracelet with the S 
:  and double triangle on it. The bracelet is sterling silver. The 
:  underside bears the word "Clear," L. Ron Hubbard's initials, the 
:  engraved name of the person, the date they were declared Clear and 
:  their Clear number. An Operating Thetan is signified by a gold 
:  bracelet of the same design. 

PM- HCOPL 28 Dec RA Rev. 4 Feb 91 E-Meters Allowed
P-C HCOPL 28 Dec Enrollment in Suppressive Groups
P-- HCOPL 29 Dec Shipping Material to South Africa
>-C HCOB  29 Dec clearing course successes
PMC HCOPL 30 Dec PTS Auditing and Routing
P-- HCOPL 31 Dec Corr. to 21 Nov 65 Cheque Signing.
--C HCOEL 31 Dec Ron's journal no. 18

====================== end of 1965

Notes:

The only reference I know of where Ron actually mentions someone
becoming sick from R6 materials is in old tech volume VI as
HCOPL of 11 Aug 71 "security of data" which was ammended and
reissued 28 Mar 74 and which was taken from and replaces
HCOPL 10 Nov 66 which in turn was an excerpt from HCOPL 4 Oct 65
(see the above list) which was confidential.  The latest version
in the new master list is again 11 Aug 71 without mentioning
that it includes later revisions.  This is the one that goes
"Issued with a small amount of R6 data, three or four persons
promply used it ..." which is around on the net in various
versions.  And so the only policy where Ron tried to justify
making the materials confidential was rewritten numerous times 
and nobody is supposed to see the original.  Isn't that interesting.


==========================================

All of this weeks posts were posted with the following trailer -

------------------
The free Self Clearing Book, The Super Scio book, and the
"SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" are all over the net.

See The Self Clearing Homepage for URLs to these sites
http://freezoneamerica.org/pilot/selfclr.htmlor
http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/clear.htmlOr see The Pilots Home Page at http://freezoneamerica.org/pilot/index.htmlSome translations are available, see links at freezoneamerica.org

All of the current posts will be collected in Super Scio Archives
#52 and posted to ACT.  See the Pilot Archives at freezoneamerica.ORG.

Individual posts to ARS are being double posted to ACT rather than 
cross posted to foil the spambot attack which takes good headers 
and attaches garbage messages to them.

Note that some of my posts only go to ACT.  I cannot be reached by email.
I watch ARS and ACT for messages with Pilot in the subject line.

------------------